Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (1.20 seconds)

Mo Nadeem Mohammedali Writer vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Shrimali Mehul Nareshbhai vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Sati Rochak Krishnavallabh vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Kanjibhai Ambalal Parmar vs Gujarat Krushi University Fal ... on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Shreykumar Sunilkumar Naik vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Vivek Babulal Meena vs The Chief General Manager (Hr) on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Bhumikaben Narsinhbhai Prajapati vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Arunkumar Rupabhai Parmar vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Farhan Anwarbhai Vhora vs Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited on 27 February, 2020

52. The last but not the least, necessary would be the reference of Article 5 of Part­II of the Constitution of India, under the heading of Citizenship, which says that at the commencement of this Constitution, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India and who was born in the territory of India or either who was born in the territory of India or who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than 05 years immediately preceding such a commencement, shall be a citizen of India. Thus, every person, who has his domicile in the territory of India at the commencement of the Constitution or is borne in the territory of India is a citizen of this country. All the petitioners are citizens of this country. Applying the popular meaning of the expression "Domicile" as per the Apex Court's decision in case of Chandhigarh Hsng. Board vs. Gurmit Singh, 2002 (2) SCC 29 means the person has a permanent home or he being there for years with an intention to live permanently or indefinitely under the Indian Constitution.
Gujarat High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document
1   2 3 Next