Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 79 (1.22 seconds)
Documents citing National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sucha Singh And Ors. on 29 September, 1993

New India Assurance Co., Shimla vs Kamla And Ors on 27 March, 2001

The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sucha Singh (supra) that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of Section 15 of the Act, propounds a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the world over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion. What was originally a forgery would remain null and void for ever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sanctification subsequently done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 649 - Full Document

Naresh Kumar vs Karam Singh And Ors on 19 February, 2016

In FAO Nos. 562, 563 & 564 of 1997 preferred by the insurance company, it is argued by the learned counsel for the appellant - company that reliance by the learned Tribunal on National Insurance Company Limited versus Sucha Singh and others is not correct as it is a settled position of law that subsequent renewal of a driving licence which is not genuine cannot confer any validity thereon.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - L Gill - Full Document

(O&M;) New India Assn. Co.Lt vs Gurmeet Kaur And Ors on 23 April, 2018

13. The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Sucha Singh (supra) that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of Section 15 of the Act, propounds a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the world over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion. What was originally a forgery would remain null and void for ever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sanctification subsequently done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document

Amarjit Kaur vs Surinder Singh And Ors on 13 January, 2023

Under Issue no.3, it was held that originally the licence of Surinder Singh (driver of Bus No.PB-11-B-8517) may not be valid but it was validly renewed by the D.T.O. Office, Patiala and copy of the driving licence of Surinder Singh was placed on record as Exhibit R-1. By placing reliance upon the judgment of Division Bench rendered in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sucha Singh 1994(1) P.L.R. 140, it was held that even if the original driving licence is not valid but renewal is valid, in that case, it gets its validity and the Insurance Company is liable to Page 4 of 33 4 of 33 ::: Downloaded on - 27-05-2023 02:00:04 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:006057 reimburse the insured. Consequently, the Insurance Company was held liable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dxn Herbal Mfg. (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commr. Of C. Ex. on 30 December, 2005

The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sucha Singh 1994 ACJ 374 (P&H) that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of Section 15 of the Act, propounds a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the world over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion. What was originally a forgery would remain null and void forever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sandification subsequently done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ici India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 26 September, 2002

"The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sucha Singh [1994 ACJ 374 (P & H)] that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of Section 15 of the Act, propounds a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the world over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion. What was originally a forgery would remain null and void forever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sanctification subsequentty done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery ."(emphasis supplied)
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

United India Insurance Company vs Ram Sawari Devi And Ors. on 16 January, 2002

The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sucha Singh. 1994 (1) ACJ 374, that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will probe even a forged document with validity on account of Section 15 of the Act, propound a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is, allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counter-feiters the words over as they would be encouraged to manufactures fake documents in (sic). What was originally a forgery would remain null and void forever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sanctification subsequently done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - D N Prasad - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Santro Devi And Ors. on 28 October, 1996

6. The Tribunal found, the deceased was killed on account of rash and negligent driving of the above referred truck by Rajbir Singh driver, owned by Kinara Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and insured with the appellant. The plea of false implication and alibi were rejected. It was observed while holding the appellant liable that the driving licence of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident was not issued by the Appropriate Authority at Gwalior. Resultantly, it was a fake licence issued on 9.11.1987, though it was twice renewed by a duly authorised licencing Authority at Toharfa firstly upto 8.11.1989 and then upto 9.11.1990. The Tribunal relied on the law laid down by Division Bench of this Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sucha Singh and Ors., (1994-1)106 P.L.R. 140 to the effect that valid renewal of a fake licence would render it to be a valid driving licence. Thus, there being no violation of the contract of insurance between the insurer and the insured and as a necessary corollary, the appellant insurance company was found liable for the indemnity.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 10 - V S Aggarwal - Full Document

Shri Rajnikant vs The Commissioner Of Police on 24 September, 2013

13. The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sucha Singh (1994 (1) Acc CJ 374) (supra) that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of S. 15 of the Act, propound a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the world over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 71 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A.K. Saxena vs Union Of India Through on 1 October, 2013

13. The observation of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sucha Singh (1994 (1) Acc CJ 374) (supra) that renewal of a document which purports to be a driving licence, will robe even a forged document with validity on account of S. 15 of the Act, propound a very dangerous proposition. If that proposition is allowed to stand as a legal principle, it may, no doubt, thrill counterfeiters the words over as they would be encouraged to manufacture fake documents in a legion. What was originally a forgery would remain null and void for ever and it would not acquire legal validity at any time by whatever process of sanctification subsequently done on it. Forgery is antithesis to legality and law cannot afford to validate a forgery.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 82 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next