Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (1.16 seconds)
Documents citing V.B. Prasad vs Manager, P.M.D.U.P. School & Ors on 10 April, 2007

Dr.Kumud Shrivastava vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 April, 2012

In support of their contentions, learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the following judgments: G.P. Doval & Others Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of UP & Others, 1984 SCC (L&S) 767; The Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers' Association and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, AIR 1990 SC 1607; State of West Bengal and others Vs. Aghore Nath Dey and others, 1993 SCC (L&S) 783; L. Chandra Kishore Singh Vs. State of Manipur and others,1999 SCC (L&S) 1460; S.K. Chopra Vs. State of MP and others, 1997 MPLSR 61; S. Sumnyan & Others vs. Limi Niri and others, (2010) 6 SCC 791; Hansa Dutt Pandey & Others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others, Writ Petition No.187/2010, decided on 7.9.2011 by Uttarachal High Court (DB); Dr. (Smt) Seema Raizada Vs. The State of MP and others, O.A.No.1763/2000, decided on 26.2.2001 by MP SAT; The General Manager South Central Railway, Secunderabad and Another Vs. AVR Siddhanti & Others, AIR 1974 SC 175; O.P. Singla and another Vs. Union of India and others, AIR 1984 SC 1595; Food Corporation of India and others Vs. Ashish Kumar Ganguly, AIR 2009 SC 2582; Abida Qureshi Vs. State of MP and others, 2009(3) MPLJ 146; B. Manmad Reddy and others Vs. Chandra Prakash Reddy and others, AIR 2010 SC 1001; Union of India and others, M. Mathivanan, AIR 2006 SC 2326; State of Orissa and others, Saroj Kumar Jena, (2011) 2 SCC 794; V.B. Prasad Vs. Manager, PMDUP School and Others, AIR 2007 SC 2053; P.D. Aggarwal and others Vs. State of UP and others, AIR 1987 SC 1676; Ashutosh Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 2002 SC 1533; Rudra Kumar Sain and others (supra); Arun Kumar Chhatterjee Vs. South Eastern Railway and others, AIR 1985 SC 30 482; G.S. Gill and others Vs. The State of Punjab and others, AIR 1974 SC 1898; and, D.P. Maheshwari Vs. Delhi Administration and others, AIR 1984 SC 153.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 2218 - Full Document

Ramcharit Dwivedi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 September, 2014

In support of aforesaid submission, learned Government Advocate has placed referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in V.B.Prasad vs. Manager, P.M.D. Upper Primary School and others, (2007) 10 SCC 269. It is also submitted that taking into account the duties which are to be performed by Area Education Officer, the experience as mentioned in the Rules has to be construed to mean the teaching experience either on the post of Head Master Middle School, Upper Division Teacher as well as 'Adhyapak' and the same cannot be construed to mean the over all teaching experience. It was also pointed out that clarificatory memo was accordingly issued on 24.8.2013 by the Commissioner, Public Instructions, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 2342 - A Aradhe - Full Document

Cpi India I Ltd vs Bptp Ltd And Others on 3 July, 2015

96. Mr. Amit Sibal, learned Senior counsel for BPTP submitted that there is no mechanism for enforcement of an order of the AT and the prayers in the Section 9 application belie the true nature of the said application which is nothing but seeking an execution of the order of the AT. Reliance is placed on the decision in V.B. Prasad v. Manager P.M.D.U.P School (2007) 10 SCC 269. It is submitted that the very same reliefs prayed for in the petition under Section 9 have been already prayed for before the AT under Section 17 of the Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Bptp Limited vs Cpi India I Limited & Ors on 3 July, 2015

96. Mr. Amit Sibal, learned Senior counsel for BPTP submitted that there is no mechanism for enforcement of an order of the AT and the prayers in the Section 9 application belie the true nature of the said application which is nothing but seeking an execution of the order of the AT. Reliance is placed on the decision in V.B. Prasad v. Manager P.M.D.U.P School (2007) 10 SCC 269. It is submitted that the very same reliefs prayed for in the petition under Section 9 have been already prayed for before the AT under Section 17 of the Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 1 - S Muralidhar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next