Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 358 (0.71 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Ram Sagar Yadav And Ors on 18 January, 1985

State vs . Ram Sagar on 28 May, 2013

At the time of alleged incident, she was State Vs. Ram Sagar FIR no. 84/12 Page No.11 of 28 returning her home after purchasing the articles. She admitted that there was many customers at the shop. Accused had met her at the shop. He had taken her from the shop forcibly. She did not raise noise when the accused was taking her Vol. Becuase he had given threat to her. She denied the suggestion that she had gone with the accused on her free will and due to this reason she did not raise any noise. Accused had taken her in a bus. The bus stop was at the walking distance of about 30 minutes from the shop. They went on foot. The accused was caught holding her hand while going to the bus stop. She admitted that many public persons passed through near them while going to the bus stop. There were 2­3 passengers in the bus. She denied the suggestion that she is aged about 19 years. She denied that she had love affair with accused and had gone with him voluntarily. She denied the suggestion that she is deposing under the pressure of her mother as she was not liking the affair.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ram Sagar on 21 March, 2022

In the present case, in view of the above stated discussions, it can be held that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond State Vs. Ram Sagar FIR No.176 of 2019, PS Dabri Page No. 9 of 10 reasonable doubt. The evidence coming on record entitles the accused to be acquitted in the present case. Therefore, accused namely Ram Sagar is hereby acquitted from the offence punishable under Section 3 of DPDP Act.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Uttam vs The State Of Maharashtra on 2 June, 2022

25. The credibility of a dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate has also come up for consideration in several cases and it has been held that a Magistrate being an uninterested witness and a respected officer and there being no circumstances or material to suspect that he would have any animus against the accused or would in any way be interested for fabricating a dying declaration, such a declaration recorded by the Magistrate, ought not be doubted. Absence of corroborative evidence for convicting an accused based on a dying declaration has been a matter of discussion in several cases [Ref.: Munnu Raja (supra), Paniben (Smt.) (supra), Ram Sagar Yadav (supra), Ramawati Devi (supra) and Veerpal (supra)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 19 - H Kohli - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Chandra Pal And Others on 31 May, 2024

9. The Investigating Officer thereafter collected the relevant material and after recording the statement of the witnesses and concluding the investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the accused persons, which has been proved and marked as Exhibit Ka-10. On submission of the said charge-sheet, learned Magistrate had taken cognizance, however, since the case was exclusively triable by the court of Sessions, committed the case to the court of Sessions, where it was registered as Sessions Trial No. 291 of 1983 (State of U.P. Vs. Yad Ram and 3 Others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Gupta - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next