Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.39 seconds)

Kiran Mahajanw/O Sh. Manoj Kumar vs Sunil Kumars/O Late Sh. Chaman Lal on 25 November, 2025

In Bhupatbhai Bachubhai Chavda Vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 2024 SC 1805, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that in appeal, the first question that needs to be answered by the Appellate Court is whether the view taken by the Trial Court was a plausible view that could have been taken based on evidence on record. Appellate Court can interfere with the order of acquittal only if it is satisfied after reappreciating the evidence that the only possible conclusion was that the guilt of the accused had been established beyond a reasonable doubt. The Appellate Court cannot overturn order of acquittal only on the ground that another SUBHASH view is possible. In other words, the judgment of acquittal must KUMAR MISHRA be found to be perverse. Unless the Appellate Court records such Digitally signed by SUBHASH KUMAR MISHRA a finding, no interference can be made with the order of acquittal.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anoop Gupta vs The State And Ors on 12 December, 2025

In Bhupatbhai Bachubhai Chavda Vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 2024 SC 1805, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that in appeal, the first question that needs to be answered by the Appellate Court is whether the view taken by the Trial Court was a plausible view that could have been taken based on evidence on record. Appellate Court can interfere with the order of acquittal only if it is satisfied after reappreciating the evidence that the only possible conclusion was that the guilt of the accused had been established beyond a reasonable doubt.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1