Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.25 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Zest Packers Pvt.Ltd vs Cce Ahmedabad-Ii on 22 July, 2015

Dow Chemical International Pvt Ltd vs Kutch (Gandhidham) on 12 August, 2022

and Mukesh industries Ltd. v. CCE, Ahmedabad - 2009 (248) E.L.T. 203 (Tri.) were rendered considering Rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 and 2002 Rules as pari materia to 57F(4) of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. However in our considered view Rule 57F(4) provided for payment of 11 | P a g e E/11228/2019, E/10770/2021 duty by the principal manufacturer whereas Rule 4(5)(a) only provides sending of Cenvat availed inputs for job work and return of same to the principal manufacturer implying that the principal manufacturer shall pay duty on the same. Accordingly those judgments are of no help to the appellant.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J & S Wirelinks (P) Ltd vs Ce & Cgst Noida on 5 December, 2024

and Mukesh industries Ltd. v. CCE, Ahmedabad - 2009 (248) E.L.T. 203 (Tri.) were rendered considering Rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 and 2002 Rules as pari materia to 57F(4) of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. However in our considered view Rule 57F(4) provided for payment of duty by the principal manufacturer whereas Rule 4(5)(a) only provides sending of Cenvat availed inputs for job work and return of same to the principal manufacturer implying that the principal manufacturer shall pay duty on the same. Accordingly those judgments are of no help to the appellant.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amod Stamping Pvt Ltd vs Vadodara-I on 10 August, 2022

and Mukesh industries Ltd. v. CCE, Ahmedabad - 2009 (248) E.L.T. 203 (Tri.) were rendered considering Rule 4(5)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 and 2002 Rules as parimateria to 57F(4) of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. However in our considered view Rule 57F(4) provided for payment of duty by the principal manufacturer whereas Rule 4(5)(a) only provides sending of Cenvat availed inputs for job work and return of same to the principal manufacturer implying that the principal manufacturer shall pay duty on the same. Accordingly those judgments are of no help to the appellant.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next