Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Dinesh M.N. (S.P.) vs State Of Gujarat on 28 April, 2008

Thameeru Yogeshwar Rao vs Counsel For The on 3 December, 2013

In Dinesh M.N. (S.P) v. State of Gujarat (1 supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that bail cannot be cancelled by resorting to re-appreciation of evidence. But in the same decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the Court can consider whether irrelevant materials were taken into consideration for granting bail and those irrelevant materials should be of substantial nature and not of a trivial nature.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R K Rao - Full Document

Vaibhav Sen vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 January, 2019

In this context what has been stated by a three- Judge Bench in Dinesh M.N. v. State of Gujarat is quite instructive. In the said case, the Court has held that where the Court admits the accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Keshav Singh Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 May, 2019

In this context what has been stated by a three-Judge Bench in Dinesh M.N. v. State of Gujarat is quite instructive. In the said case, the Court has held that where the Court admits the accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Vijaysingh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 May, 2019

In this context what has been stated by a three-Judge Bench in Dinesh M.N. v. State of Gujarat is quite instructive. In the said case, the Court has held that where the Court admits the accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

C.Hindumathi vs The State Of Ap., on 11 September, 2018

In Dinesh M.N. (S.P) v. State of Gujarat30, the three Judge Bench of the Apex Court held that where the Court admits the Accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of 29 AIR 2005 SC 4462 30 (2008) 5 SCC 66 32 Dr. SSRB,J Crl.P.Nos.12683, 24692 & 24695 of 2017 consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Telangana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Smt. C. Hindumathi vs The State Of A.P Rep By Its P.P on 11 September, 2018

In Dinesh M.N. (S.P) v. State of Gujarat30, the three Judge Bench of the Apex Court held that where the Court admits the Accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of 29 AIR 2005 SC 4462 30 (2008) 5 SCC 66 32 Dr. SSRB,J Crl.P.Nos.12683, 24692 & 24695 of 2017 consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Telangana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

C Hindumathi vs State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp on 11 September, 2018

In Dinesh M.N. (S.P) v. State of Gujarat30, the three Judge Bench of the Apex Court held that where the Court admits the Accused to bail by taking into consideration irrelevant materials and keeping out of 29 AIR 2005 SC 4462 30 (2008) 5 SCC 66 32 Dr. SSRB,J Crl.P.Nos.12683, 24692 & 24695 of 2017 consideration the relevant materials the order becomes vulnerable and such vulnerability warrants annulment of the order.
Telangana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next