Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)

Balveer vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 September, 2021

It is made clear that single default in appearance before the Trial Court, or in case of registration of new offence, this bail order 6 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.45923/2021 Balveer vs. State of M.P. shall automatically come to an end and the cash surety so furnished by the applicant shall automatically stand forfeited without any reference to the Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Balveer Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 October, 2021

The fact is that Bhagirath Shivhare had purchased the vehicle from the applicant and on the fateful day the said vehicle was forcibly taken away from the possession of the driver, who is an employee of Bhagirath. Aman Khatik (PW-1) has turned hostile only on the question of identity and he has also stated that two persons had forcibly taken away his vehicle form his possession. As the vehicle in question has been seized from the possession of the 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.51742/2021 Balveer Singh Vs. State of M.P. applicant, therefore, it is clear that merely because Aman Khatik (PW-1) has turned hostile on the question of identity, would not be beneficial to the applicant. The previous bail application of the applicant has already been dismissed on merits. As no change in circumstance could be pointed out by the counsel for the applicant, accordingly, the application fails and is hereby dismissed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Balveer Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 September, 2020

Per contra, the application is opposed by the counsel for the State as well as the complainant. It is submitted by the counsel for the State that that it is incorrect to say that the cremation was done in the 2 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.33804/2020 Balveer Yadav vs. State of M.P. presence of the parents of the deceased. In fact when the parents of the deceased reached the matrimonial house of the deceased, then they found that the dead body was already burning. It is further submitted that since the father of the deceased had got compensation in lieu of the land which was acquired, therefore, they were demanding Rs.10,000,00/-, so that they can purchase four wheeler vehicle. It is further submitted by the counsel for the State that the deceased has been survived by her three years old daughter and three months old son.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Balveer vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 January, 2022

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is 2 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC.1678/2022 Balveer and Anr. v. State of M.P. directed that the applicants be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) each with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document
1