Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Bindeshwari vs Board Of Revenue And Ors. on 21 December, 2001

Noor Mohammad & 2 Others vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation, ... on 19 May, 2020

Similar observations have been made by the Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Sawarni Vs. Smt. Inder Kaur and others; 1996 (7) JT S.C. 580; and in Narayan Singh and another Vs. Additional Commissioner Meerut Division Meerut; 1999 (17) LCD 778 and in Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue, 2002 (20) LCD 2006; Mst Bhagirathi Devi vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation Varanasi; 2016 (133) RD 450.
Allahabad High Court Cites 68 - Cited by 1 - S Chandra - Full Document

Smt. Kalawati vs The Board Of Revenue And 6 Others on 5 April, 2022

10. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors.8, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document

Smt. Kalawati vs The Board Of Revenue And 6 Others on 5 April, 2022

10. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors.8, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 57 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document

Brahanand Pandey vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 18 April, 2023

34. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors., 2002 (1) AWC 498, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent Court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Balak Ram vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 20 April, 2023

9. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors., 2002 (1) AWC 498, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent Court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiv Kumari Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 23 May, 2023

5. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors., 2002 (1) AWC 498, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent Court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anvar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 17 Others on 25 May, 2023

10. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors., 2002 (1) AWC 498, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent Court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Swaroop And 2 Others vs Additional Commissioner And 6 Others on 24 August, 2023

15. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors., 2002 (1) AWC 498, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent Court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lallau vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., ... on 25 July, 2025

9. Reiterating a similar view in the case of Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors., 20025 (1) AWC 498, it was stated that mutation proceedings do not adjudicate the rights of parties and orders passed in the said proceedings are always subject to adjudication by the competent court and therefore a writ petition against an order in mutation proceedings would not be entertainable. It was observed as follows:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - A Mathur - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next