Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi vs Sunil Kumar Gupta on 15 April, 2015

Bhan Prakash vs Govt. Of Nctd on 20 February, 2019

"In compliance of decision of Hon‟ble High Court, Delhi dated 05- 11-2014 WP (C) 1378/2014, C.M. No. 2879/2014 in the matter of GNCT of Delhi and Ors. Vs. Narender Singh & decision of Hon‟ble Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in MA/2494/2014, OA/1548/2003 & MA/2495/2014 in the matter of Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sunil Kumar & Ors. and in the light of opinion of Law Department, GNCT of Delhi vide note dated 20/11/2013, Competent Authority has accorded approval vide U.O. No. 1907 dated 14.07.2015 to count the past services, for the purpose of grant of benefits under ACP/MACP Scheme only, to those employees who have rendered services in DEDA/DSMDC and declared surplus and further re-deployed in GNCT of Delhi vide several orders issued by Services - II Department, GNCT of Delhi from time to time.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K C Gupta vs Govt. Of Nctd on 9 March, 2016

In Dinesh Verma (supra) and Sunil Kumar (supra) Hon'ble High Court has dealt with a similar situation but the 10 OA No.3553/2012 major difference is that in that in that case the employees were formally declared surplus and formally deployed by the State Government. In such a situation, Hon'ble High Court took a view that the benefit of service rendered in the autonomous organisation prior to their redeployment will have to be taken into account while considering the benefits of ACP scheme. In the present case also having come to the conclusion that the applicants were surplus since there was no post of messenger in DSACS, and their redeployment with the full knowledge and consent of the DSACS and the State Government, we find no reason for denying the benefits of the period served in DSACS in accordance with the law on the subject. In our view the ratio laid down in the afore-quoted judgments of Hon'ble High Court would be applicable in this case also.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1