Jagdish Thakur vs Manoj Sharma on 9 July, 2001
4. The Counsel for t he respondent-landlord further, relied upon a Judgment Mool Chand and Anr. v. Ishwarlal and Anr., AIR 1974 (Raj.) 163 = 1973 RLW 333 (1) wherein the learned Single Judge took the view that even if the tenant deposited the House-Tax before the Municipal Board claiming himself to be the owner of the house, the same amounts to denial of title by a tenant against the landlord and that was treated as a legal and valid ground for eviction. It was therefore submitted that a similar situation exists in this case wherein the defendant-ap-pellant has been held guilty of misrepresentation relying on cogent evidence recorded by the two Court of facts, which is substantial ground of eviction as per the Act of 1950.