Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 69 (1.27 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Samman Dass on 11 January, 1972

State vs . on 17 August, 2013

8. On the close of the prosecution evidence, the accused was examined in terms of Section 313 of Cr. PC. On putting the incriminating facts and circumstances on the record, accused stated that the prosecutrix / girl child accompanied on her own will with her to Kolkata where they performed marriage on 28.02.2013 at Village Chandipur but he denied that he had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix / girl child. FIR No. 63/13 State v. Suman Dass Page no. 4 of 13
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Santosh Dass Etc on 5 September, 2011

1) According to the prosecution case complainant Vinod Kumar who was working as salesman at the shoe shop in Karol FIR no. 237/02 (State Vs Santosh Dass ) page no...... 1 Bagh and was returning from his work at about 10pm on 28/4/2002 and when he was purchasing lemon on the way at L­2 Block, Mohan Garden in the Shani Bazar, one Monu already known to him was standing near the rehri of Golgappa and started quarreling with him and Monu slapped him 4­5 times and in the meantime his cousin brother Rakesh came there and he alongwith Rakesh thrashed Monu and after thrashing, Monu went from there by saying that he would return after sometime. When complainant reached in front of his house the said Monu alongwith Santosh came there having sariyas in their hands and their accomplice Bittoo was having danda in his hand and another boy was also having sariya. Monu asked his three associates to beat the complainant by saying that they will not spare him today. He was given beatings with danda, sariya and legs blows and fist blows as a result he fell down on the ground; they then attacked Devi Prasad, uncle of the complainant who was sleeping outside the house on a takhat and Bittoo gave him sariya blow and Monu and Santosh and fourth boy gave sariya blow on the head of uncle of the complainant.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of West Bengal vs Sankar Sundar Dutta on 10 August, 2006

66. Thus, after analysis of the prosecution evidence which we are duty bound to perform being the Appellate Court and after hearing submissions of both Mr. Safiullah and Mr. Basu in the backdrop of the judgment and order impugned in this appeal, we hold keeping in mind the cardinal rules laid down in the case of Samman Dass 1972 Cri LJ 487 (supra) and reiterated in the case of Kalu alias Mashi 2006 Cri LJ 799 (supra) that the learned Judge totally misdirected herself in the matter of appreciation of prosecution evidence and we believe it will not be unfair on our part if we bring on record that appreciation of evidence done by the learned Judge was, in fact, perverse and in a preconceived manner. We find from scanning of evidence that there was no possibility to lend any support to the proposition that some unknown persons from a moving vehicle threw bombs targeting Uday and Naresh and at the same time, on scanning of evidence we find that FIR lodged by P.W. 3 was a genuine and an authentic document and P.W. 3 to P.W. 5 supported the prosecution case satisfactorily and prosecution case was also supported by medical I report, by seizure of different articles from I the place of occurrence and by report of the I ballistic expert.
Calcutta High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Karnataka vs Pampapathy on 22 December, 2020

42. It is also well settled proposition of law that the relationship of the witnesses to the deceased would not be a sufficient ground for discrediting their testimony. It is well known that the close relatives of a murdered person are most reluctant to spare the real assailant and falsely involve another person in place of the assailant. If the natural conduct of the witnesses related to the deceased, is credit worthy, then the same can be relied upon. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Samman Dass reported in (1972) 3 SCC 201, wherein at paragraph No.23 it has been observed as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramanjini S/O Lingappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 December, 2020

42. It is also well settled proposition of law that the relationship of the witnesses to the deceased would not be a sufficient ground for discrediting their testimony. It is well known that the close relatives of a murdered person are most reluctant to spare the real assailant and falsely involve another person in place of the assailant. If the natural conduct of the witnesses related to the deceased, is credit worthy, then the same can be relied upon. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Samman Dass reported in (1972) 3 SCC 201, wherein at paragraph No.23 it has been observed as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri.Pampapathy vs The State Of Karnataka, on 22 December, 2020

42. It is also well settled proposition of law that the relationship of the witnesses to the deceased would not be a sufficient ground for discrediting their testimony. It is well known that the close relatives of a murdered person are most reluctant to spare the real assailant and falsely involve another person in place of the assailant. If the natural conduct of the witnesses related to the deceased, is credit worthy, then the same can be relied upon. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Samman Dass reported in (1972) 3 SCC 201, wherein at paragraph No.23 it has been observed as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sadakali S/O Lingappa, vs The State Of Karnataka, on 22 December, 2020

42. It is also well settled proposition of law that the relationship of the witnesses to the deceased would not be a sufficient ground for discrediting their testimony. It is well known that the close relatives of a murdered person are most reluctant to spare the real assailant and falsely involve another person in place of the assailant. If the natural conduct of the witnesses related to the deceased, is credit worthy, then the same can be relied upon. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Samman Dass reported in (1972) 3 SCC 201, wherein at paragraph No.23 it has been observed as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Durgappa S/O Dodda Sunkanna, vs State Of Karnataka, on 22 December, 2020

42. It is also well settled proposition of law that the relationship of the witnesses to the deceased would not be a sufficient ground for discrediting their testimony. It is well known that the close relatives of a murdered person are most reluctant to spare the real assailant and falsely involve another person in place of the assailant. If the natural conduct of the witnesses related to the deceased, is credit worthy, then the same can be relied upon. This proposition of law has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Samman Dass reported in (1972) 3 SCC 201, wherein at paragraph No.23 it has been observed as under:
Karnataka High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next