Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing Phalwant Singh vs Jai Narain on 11 July, 1980

Sumitra Devi vs Rameshwar Dayal And Ors. on 29 July, 1988

In support of his contention be referred to a decision of this court in Sh. Phalwant Singh v. Sh. Jai Naraln Tripathi (1980 (2) Rlr 3U3). I need not, however, resolve the controversy on this point. I find that this appeal has been pending for the last 15 years and it would be much unrealistic to dismiss the same on the ground that the certified copy did not bear the court fee stamp. I would, therefore, not only condone the delay in filing the certified copy of the judgment but permit the appellant to affix the requisite court fee on it. This application C.M. 68S/74 thus also stands allowed.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

Anoop Kumar Aggarwal vs Rekha Gupta on 5 July, 2025

38. Ld. Counsel for petitioner vehemently argued that the tender of rent by the respondent/tenant through cheque in the reply dated 28.05.2019 is not a valid tender. For such purpose, Ld. Counsel for petitioner also relied upon the observations of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Phalwant Singh Vs. Jai Narayan [18 (1980) DLT 360]. However, such observations of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court are not applicable to the present case as the facts in that case are distinguishable from the present case.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Gurdeep Singh vs Sh. Anil Kumar Chawla on 27 August, 2012

3. I have heard the arguments and perused the record. The relationship of landlord and tenant is admitted between the parties and even rate of rent @ Rs. 1,827/- per month is admitted by the respondent. It is further admitted that the respondent has paid the rent up to 31/07/2008 and thereafter a demand draft was sent to the petitioner after the service of legal notice. Admittedly, demand draft was sent in the joint name of the petitioner i.e. Sh. Gurdeep Singh and his brother Sh. Jasvinder Singh who had no interest in the tenanted premises, due to a demand draft of Rs. 76,000/- was returned being not a valid tender. Even otherwise it has been held in Phalwant singh V. Jai Narain, 1980 RLR 558 and 2002 RLR 385 (SC) titled Gopi Chand Vs. Jain Plastic that a payment of rent by DDs/cheque is not a valid tender of rent, if it E-297/11 Gurdeep Singh Vs. Anil Kumar Chawla 2/3 is not an agreed mode of payment.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1