Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Vijay Shankar Tiwari @ Dhunni Tiwari vs State Of U.P. And Another on 12 October, 2017

Subash Chandra Gupta And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 17 February, 2021

Another writ petition being Writ Petition No.27271 of 2009 (Vijay Shankar Vs. State of U.P. and another). Another writ petition was filed by the Head Master namely Dhananjay Pathak and the petitioners filed Writ Petition No.14597 of 2011 before this Court for payment of their salaries. All the petitions were clubbed together and decided on 09.05.2011 by which the order dated 23.05.2008 passed by the Assistant Director of Education (Basic) Varanasi Mandal, Varanasi had been quashed and the matter was remitted back to Director of Education (Basic) U.P. Lucknow for conducting fresh enquiry in the matter.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P Padia - Full Document

Yamuna Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U P And 3 Others on 31 August, 2022

42. As far as Regulation 492 is concerned, though the same is not directly involved herein, but suffice it to say that it has been held to be directory, and not mandatory, by a Division Bench of this court in the case of Vijay Shanker Tiwari v. State of U.P. & ors., 1996 (14) LCD 126 which has been followed by the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Police v. Sukhbeer Singh , 2014 SCC Online Delhi Delhi 1985.
Allahabad High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Subash Chandra Gupta vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 2 August, 2021

The other writ petition was filed by one Vijay Shankar bearing Writ Petition No. 27271 of 2009 (Vijay Shankar Vs. State of U.P. and another). Those writ petitions were decided by judgment dated 09.05.2011 quashing the order dated 23.05.2008. A direction was given to the Director of Education (Basic) for conducting a fresh inquiry. The Director of Education (Basic) conducted inquiry pursuant to the directions of this Court and passed an order on 05.03.2012 holding appointment of the petitioners to be illegal. It was on the following grounds:
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1