Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.33 seconds)
Documents citing Hindusthan Aeronautics Employees ... vs Special Court Constituted Under A.P. ... on 7 October, 2004

Suo Motu vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2024

2024:KER:82715 can be imposed only through legislation by the State and not through judicial legislation. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India and Others - [(2008) 5 SCC 511]; Assistant Commissioner, Assessment-II, Bangalore and Others v. M/s Velliappa Textiles Ltd. and another - [(2003) 11 SCC 405; Hindustan Aeronautics Employees Co-op Housing Society Ltd v. Special Court - [(2004) 6 ALD 769]; Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. and Others v. Union of India - [AIR 1962 SC 305]; Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others - [(1985) 1 SCC 641]; Bennett Coleman & Co and Others v. Union of India and Others - [(1972) 2 SCC 788];
Kerala High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dejo Kappan vs Deccan Herald on 7 November, 2024

2024:KER:82715 can be imposed only through legislation by the State and not through judicial legislation. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India and Others - [(2008) 5 SCC 511]; Assistant Commissioner, Assessment-II, Bangalore and Others v. M/s Velliappa Textiles Ltd. and another - [(2003) 11 SCC 405; Hindustan Aeronautics Employees Co-op Housing Society Ltd v. Special Court - [(2004) 6 ALD 769]; Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. and Others v. Union of India - [AIR 1962 SC 305]; Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others - [(1985) 1 SCC 641]; Bennett Coleman & Co and Others v. Union of India and Others - [(1972) 2 SCC 788];
Kerala High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Public Eye vs Union Of India on 7 November, 2024

2024:KER:82715 can be imposed only through legislation by the State and not through judicial legislation. Reliance is placed on the decisions in Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India and Others - [(2008) 5 SCC 511]; Assistant Commissioner, Assessment-II, Bangalore and Others v. M/s Velliappa Textiles Ltd. and another - [(2003) 11 SCC 405; Hindustan Aeronautics Employees Co-op Housing Society Ltd v. Special Court - [(2004) 6 ALD 769]; Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. and Others v. Union of India - [AIR 1962 SC 305]; Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others - [(1985) 1 SCC 641]; Bennett Coleman & Co and Others v. Union of India and Others - [(1972) 2 SCC 788];
Kerala High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arif Noorul Hassan Rep. By Gpa Holder, ... vs State Of A.P., Revenue And Ors. on 1 May, 2007

61. Having regard to the provisions of the. Act and the acts of land grabbing as defined thereunder, the matter has come up for consideration before the Larger Bench of this Court in Hindusthan Aeronautics Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Hyderabad v. Special Court (constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 1982 and Ors. where by referring to Sections 2(e), 7A(5), 8(7) of the said Act, held that:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yelamanchili Chinnmai Sai Kiran @ Siva ... vs 1. Syed Athwar Rahaman 2. The State Of ... on 14 August, 2012

3. Placing reliance on decisions of larger bench of this Court in Hindusthan Aeronautics Employees Co-operative Housing Society Limited v Special Court1 and Division Bench of this Court in Shalivahana Builders Private Limited v Sri Ganapathy Co-operative Housing Society2, it is contended by the petitioner's counsel that attempt to grab land does not amount to land grabbing as defined under Section 2(e) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (in short, the Act). The said decisions were rendered in relation to civil proceedings before the Special Court under the Act when the applicant therein sought for grant of injunction against attempt to dispossess the land. The said decisions may not be applicable in a Criminal Court wherein the allegations are that A.1 and others entered into the land in question and have cut about 300 fully grown up trees in the land. It is only for that reason the police filed charge sheet against the accused not only for the offence under Section 5 of the Act but also under Sections 447 and 427 IPC. According to the prosecution, there is accomplished criminal trespass into the land and accomplished mischief by way of cutting about 300 grown up trees in the said land.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S G Rajulu - Full Document

T.K.Mahesh vs Ch.Yadaiah on 31 July, 2014

Thereafter, the evidence was let in by both parties. The Principal District Judge vide his Order, dated 18-01-2005, has dismissed LGOP No.210 of 2000 as not maintainable by following the judgment of a Full Bench of this Court in Hindustan Aeronautics Employees Co-operative Housing Society Limited vs. Special Court constituted under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, rep. by its Registrar, Hyderabad and others , wherein it was held that under the Act, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the cases filed on the allegation of attempt to grab land. Pursuant to the dismissal of the said LGOP, the District Court has sent back both the suits to the II AJCJ Court for disposal on merits.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - C V Reddy - Full Document
1