Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.04 seconds)

Smt. Harsh Grover vs Sh. H.S. Bajaj on 22 January, 2013

13. The counsel for the appellant also relied upon decision in Arjunan Vs Universal Fertilizer Corporation 2009 (12) JT 152. That was a case under Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and control) Act 1960. In that case High Court of Madras has dismissed miscellaneous petition filed by the tenant for extension of time in depositing arrears of rent. In that case an ex-parte eviction order was passed by Rent Controller on the ground of non payment. While setting aside that eviction order the tenant was directed to deposit rent within 15 days. He failed to comply with the same and his first appeal was dmissed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority. The High Court granted one week time to deposit rent which was not complied. The RCT No. 43/12 9 /11 10 tenant sought extension of time which was declined by the High Court. Taking notice of the fact that tenant has deposited the rent within time granted by Hon'ble Supreme Court, the appeal of the tenant was accepted and the matter was remanded back to Ld. ARC to decide the case on merits.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1