Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing R.K. Kawatra, Etc. vs D.S.I.D.C., Etc. on 2 May, 1991

Patangali vs State Of U.P. on 1 June, 2012

(iii) R.K. Kawatra, v. D.S.I.D.C., AIR 1992 Delhi 28 In this case some persons under the old scheme of allotment deposited the amount. The scheme was not finalised. Thereafter, new scheme was introduced providing for higher amount to be paid for the allotted land. Those persons taking benefit of the new scheme deposited higher amount after adjustment of deposit made under old scheme. It was held that those persons were bound by the new scheme.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

RŠ](“„Xqan'R TNs`P`G\^Y1Qpr # ... vs \^U[„Xoj” on 17 July, 2009

T r M 'F % - 6'F R/ % ' € %R CE,E < R 7_8 ., d 3 ` 27;7 9 d , 2 j ? W T S JFi }%C M C  *‚ n S % ' -'O.,8 € %S CE,E  ? !727 '3 5 -' ` 2 ! 9 " 1 ; S 5 b 3 ` 2E ` R ]> v C ' , 5 T 1 ` S S6ƒq]s g h JFi % ! 'F ~? C b 3 l"„(… " p # '. 85 b K ` †F R ; 1 R 5 b ( ` 2E ` S V>]‡& ! 9 % ' % '( ˆ ` & - R8P C -/0 WE 9 C | R6‰ 2% T ˆ 5 X # 'D. 8C b ` N ; ? C : 'F , 9. 272 1 ;8+ R'‰ - R8Š7 !E 74 ! - ` S Š -‚ { E 1 5 3 Y 2% T ‹ 5 ? 7 6F R'Œ% M C ; E 'F 6\ ] # 7` M &6\ C7C'F ~? C b 3 C < 1 % ? B - R8 C7` M " T 9. 7 'F # R ]> @ … > mY% o'F ? C 'O8 < 1 b X Hq]s g %C ˆ !E R'U 72798 , 5 # y % 7 Ž Ž ‘ ’‰“ ”0•,“ ”?–<—  ˜R™  ‘ ’‰š`”W–&Ž -š2Ž  ›eœ( ŽC‘!˜ˆ›F ž?ŸCb’3š  ˜ ‘-“S {“ !¡;™,ŽR¢C”?Ÿ ›
Delhi District Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1