Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Gobind Lall Seal And Ors. vs Debendronath Mullick And Ors. on 11 August, 1880

Alagiri Chetty And Anr. vs Muthuswami Chetty And Ors. on 2 August, 1939

8. Mr. Sitarama Rao also cited Gobind Lal Seal v. Debendranath Mullick (1881) 6 Cal. 311. There one Hira Lal Seal who was the owner of a house and the predecessor-in-title of the plaintiff allowed the defendant's predecessor to occupy the house and the question arose whether Article 142 or Article 144 governed the suit brought to recover possession of it. The learned Judges held that, Article 144 applied to the case, Garth C.J. observing:
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Grace Samuel vs Rani @ Porkilai on 20 February, 2012

20. The term 'trespass' is a wrong in another's possession and the proper person to sue is the person who is in actual or constructive possession. Every trespass will not amount to dispossession as opined by this Court. The term 'dispossession' applies only to a case when the person in enjoyment of land has, by the act of some person, altogether lost his dominion over the land itself or the receipt of its profits, as per the decision in Gobind Lall Seal and others vs. Debendranath Mullick reported in (1881) ILR 6 Cal. 311.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document
1