Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.13 seconds)

M/S.Ashok Leyland Limited vs State Express Transport Corporation on 27 November, 2023

In the case of Adani Enterprises Limited, Mumbai v. Ankiteros Shipping Corporation16, a learned Judge of the Delhi High Court had considered the power of review qua an order passed under Section 11(6) of the 16 2019 SC Online Bombay 528 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 16 Rev.P.No.2 of 2018 in OP.No.25 of 2017 Act and had taken a decision to review an order passed by him on 21.04.2011, being of the view that the order passed was non est since it had been passed by a Court that lacked inherent jurisdiction.
Madras High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Sumanth - Full Document

M/S.Ashok Leyland Limited vs State Express Transport Corporation on 27 November, 2023

In the case of Adani Enterprises Limited, Mumbai v. Ankiteros Shipping Corporation 16, a learned Judge of the Delhi High Court had considered the power of review qua an order passed under Section 11(6) of the Act and had taken a decision to review an order passed by him on 21.04.2011, being of the view that the order passed was non est since it had been passed by a Court that lacked inherent jurisdiction.
Madras High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Sumanth - Full Document

M/S.Ashok Leyland Limited vs State Express Transport Corporation on 27 November, 2023

In the case of Adani Enterprises Limited, Mumbai v. Ankiteros Shipping Corporation 16, a learned Judge of the Delhi High Court had considered the power of review qua an order passed under Section 11(6) of the Act and had taken a decision to review an order passed by him on 21.04.2011, being of the view that the order passed was non est since it had been passed by a Court that lacked inherent jurisdiction.
Madras High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Sumanth - Full Document
1