Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.56 seconds)

Reliance General Insurance Company ... vs Ram Pyari And Ors on 3 September, 2019

19 Obviously there can be no quarrel with the prepositions laid down in the aforesaid cases, however adverting to the facts of the present case, it has come in the pleadings of the claimants that the deceased was getting salary of Rs.7000/­ per month apart from Rs.150/­ as daily allowance. This averment has been duly substantiated in the affidavit, Ext. PW1/A filed by claimant No.1,Ram Pyari, in her examination­in­chief.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Satto Devi vs Pinku Kumar on 6 July, 2024

26. Hon'ble H.P. High Court in case titled National Insurance Company Vs. Kamal Kishore & Ors, decided on 05.07.2019 FAO(MVA) No. 564/2018, it is held that under Section 149 of M.V. Act, there is no such defence available to the insurer for repudiation of claim of third party on the ground of invalid/absence of registration certificate. Perusal of insurance policy in the present case does not reflect that there is any stipulation therein that the insurer will not be liable towards third party risk for want of valid registration certificate of the vehicle.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bajeet Kaur vs Murli Kushwaha on 22 September, 2023

The Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh in case titled as National Insurnfe Company Limited Vs Kamal Kishore & ors 2019 SCC Onlines 932 has observed "When the vehcle was insured towards third party liability, it was done on the basis of Engine Number, Chasis number, these numbers were duly mentioned in the insurance policy. The Insurance Policy is the contract between insured and insurer. It was not insured on the basis of temporary registrtion number or permanent registration number. The Hon'ble High Court has further observed that " there is no connection between the cause of accident and the registration or non registration of the vehicle.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Judgment Reserved On Judgment ... vs Muthukumar

10(a) In the decision reported in 2019 (2) TNMAC 43 (HP) in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamal Kishore and others liability of the insurer in respect of unregistered motor vehicle namely where the temporary registration time has expired and in such circumstances, the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High court has taken a view that the provisions of 'compulsory insurance' made in Act with a view to protect rights of third parties also and there is no stipulation or condition in Policy that insurer is not liable to third party claim for want of valid registration certificate and hence held that no such defence is available to insurer under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicle Act for repudiation of claim on the ground of want of registration certificate. In such circumstances, the Court has held that insurer cannot escape its liability towards third party merely on the ground of non-registration of the vehicle.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insurance Company Limited ... vs Vijay Kumar Naidu on 10 December, 2024

In National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kamal Kishore and others , 2020 ACJ 176, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh was dealing with a case Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH MAMTANI Signing time: 11-12-2024 12:06:34 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-JBP:60611 5 MA-3780-2022 wherein vehicle was not registered with registration number but policy issued on the basis of engine number and chassis number as no connection between cause of accident and registration/non-registration of the vehicle as held by Hon'ble High Court that then third party liability cannot be avoided.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Rathi Devi & Others on 1 April, 2025

14 Even the Coordinate Bench of this High Court in Kamal Kishore's case, after taking into consideration various pronouncements 5 ( 2025:HHC:9828 ) of the Supreme Court with respect to third party claimant, has held that Insurance Company can be fastened liability to pay compensation to third party claimant but with right to recover the same from owner. 15 In view of above, impugned award is upheld except modification that Insurance Company shall be entitled to recover the amount, which is ordered to be paid to third party claimant, from the owner.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document
1   2 Next