citedby: 62687

1 - 3 of 3 (0.42 seconds)

Documents citing Kritkumar M. Muchhala vs Income-Tax Officer on 13 May, 1993

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gayatri Traders. on 30 April, 1996

In our considered opinion, the Tribunal, Bombay Bench-D(SMC), in the case of Kritkumar M. Muchhala vs. ITO (supra) had correctly construed the provisions of s. 271B when it held as follows :

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gayatri Traders on 30 April, 1996

In our considered opinion, the Tribunal, Bombay Bench-D(SMC), in the case of Kritkumar M. Muchhala vs. ITO (supra) had correctly construed the provisions of s. 271B when it held as follows :

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Gayatri Traders on 30 April, 1996

In our considered opinion, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench-D (SMC), in the case of Kritkumar M. Mudihala v. ITO [1993] 46 ITD 363, had correctly construed the, provisions of Section 271B when it held as follows (at page 370) :

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 26 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gayatri Traders. on 30 April, 1996

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gayatri Traders on 30 April, 1996

Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Gayatri Traders on 30 April, 1996