Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 279 (0.50 seconds)

Rajwinder Singh vs Angad on 19 September, 2011

In the instant case, as already observed above, a Mini bus falls in the category of transport vehicle as defined under section 2(47) of the Act and the driver of the offending vehicle did not have a valid licence to drive the Mini Bus which is a transport vehicle. Therefore, in view of the law laid down in Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Angad Kol (supra), this court feels that the learned Tribunal was right in granting recovery rights to the Insurance Company.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - J Chauhan - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Ali Khan 2 Sushil Kumar 3 Mohd Fazal on 18 August, 2010

In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Angad Kol (supra), the Apex Court has also discussed about its judgment rendered in the matter of National Insurance Company Ltd. V. Annappa Irappa Nesaria & Others (supra) and found that driver should always be held with effective and valid driving licence, according to type of vehicle and then only it can be said that driver is holding valid and effective licence.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co Ltd vs Saty Kumar Harivyasi And Others on 15 June, 2010

(10) In view of the above, this court is of the opinion that the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Angad Kol & Ors. (Supra) is squarely applicable in the present case. It is not disputed that the driver was having a license to drive a light motor vehicle which is different than the transport vehicle, for the purpose of issuance of driving license. Thus, it is found that the driver was not having valid driving license to drive a transport vehicle and as such since the vehicle was driven by an unauthorized person, the Insurance Company is not liable to indemnify the damages and satisfy the award.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Kumar on 8 April, 2019

10. It is also to be noted that the decision referred by the learned counsel for the appellant in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Angad Kol (supra) has been over ruled by the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Mukund Dewangan's case. It is not in dispute that the gross weight of the vehicle in question is not more than 7,500 kgs. As such, the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant cannot be accepted.
Karnataka High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - M Nawaz - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Limited ... vs Virendra Kumar Verma on 2 July, 2012

In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Angad Kol and others (supra) and New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Prabhulal (supra), is clearly applicable to the present case. It is not disputed that the driver was having license to drive a light motor vehicle, which is different from the license issued to drive a transport vehicle or medium goods vehicle. Thus, it is found that driver Sanjay Kumar was not having a valid and effective driving license to drive the offending vehicle, i.e., Metador 407, and as such, since the vehicle was driven by an unauthorized person, the insurance company is not liable to indemnify damages and satisfy the award.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next