Shiba Prasad Singh vs Rani Prayag Kumari Debi on 7 April, 1932
In such a case the income, equally with the carpus, forms part of the family property, and if the owner mixes his own moneys with the moneys of the family-as, for example, by putting the whole into one
account at the bank, or by treating them in his accounts as indistinguishable-his own earnings share with the property with which they are mingled the character of the joint family property; but no such considerations necessarily apply to the income from impartible property... Whether it be possible in any circumstances to treat movable property as an accretion to a landed estate of this character is a matter not arising for decision... In both
Janki Prashad Singh v. Dwarka Pershad Singh and Murtaza Hussain Khan v. Mahomed Yusin Ali Khan the addition of family property to the original raj is considered. Both these cases dealt with property other than movable property. In the present case their Lordships can see no
evidence in the facts stated of any sufficient intention to treat the acquired properties, whether the mauzas, mortgages or other personal estate, as part of the original raj.