Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.77 seconds)

Income Tax Officer, Ward - 3(3)(5), ... vs Vikash More, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad on 14 February, 2025

Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA) (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) Accountant Member Judicial Member Ahmedabad, the 14 th February, 2025 PBN/* Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File ITA No.1036/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 ITO vs. Vikash More Page 5 of 5 By order UE COPY Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad benches, Ahmedabad
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 13 ... vs Champalal Omprakash on 5 February, 2025

3. Whether the learned Tribunal has committed substantial error in law by not going into the merit of the case, more so in the light of judgment of Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in the case, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -5, Kolkata versus Swati Bajaj reported in the year of 2022 where it was observed that the assessee has failed to discharge legal obligations to prove the genuineness of the transaction and creditworthiness of the transaction ?"
Calcutta High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 13 ... vs Champalal Omprakash on 5 February, 2025

3. Whether the learned Tribunal has committed substantial error in law by not going into the merit of the case, more so in the light of judgment of Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta in the case, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -5, Kolkata versus Swati Bajaj reported in the year of 2022 where it was observed that the assessee has failed to discharge legal obligations to prove the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the transaction ?"
Calcutta High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document
1