Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing N. Rengaiyan vs A.M. Noorullah on 26 April, 1996

K.Muthuramalingam vs Kalyani Ragunathan on 10 April, 2007

19.The above principles have been laid down in the following judgments which are referred above: They are 1996(1)CTC 681(Rengaiyan, N. v. A.M.Noorullah) 2001(1)M.L.J.110(Hatim and Co. v. Radhakrishnan) 1999 MLJ 93(C.Prasad Rao v. C.Narasimhan) 1998 MLJ 270(M/s.Boston v. Akbar) 2000 MLJ 19(Karur Ghee Stores rep., by V.Periasamy vs. M.Palaniappan & another) 2001(3) CTC 206(Karur Ghee Stores v. N.Palaniappan) 1999 M.L.J.(Supp.)
Madras High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - S Rajeswaran - Full Document

M/S.Sonali vs C.Balaji on 19 August, 2010

25.The Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent/ Landlord contends that 'as per Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Act (XVIII of 1960) the revisional power of Honourable High Court is not similar to Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code and the High Court cannot go into the questions of fact in detail and assess the evidence in exercise of revisional powers' as per decision of this Court in N.Rengaiyan V. A.M.Noorullah 1996(I) CTC 681."
Madras High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - M Venugopal - Full Document
1