Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 597 (1.02 seconds)
Documents citing Subrata Sen And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 18 September, 2001

Laxmi Devi Aggarwal vs State Of Haryana And Others on 12 September, 2013

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of limitation, if any, the Director, Higher Education, Shiksha Sadan, Sector-5, Panchkula-respondent No.2 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide her legal notice dated 27.5.2013 (Annexure P-4), which was supplemented by notice dated 15.7.2013 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same, keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, passed in the case of Subrata Sen and others Vs. Union of India and others (2001) 8 SCC 71, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R S Malik - Full Document

Govind Prasad Sharma vs State Of M.P. Through Ministry Of ... on 15 October, 2020

However, the persons who retied from 1- 1-1996 they will be getting pension treating them to have retired on the basic pay of Rs.12,840/-. It is, therefore, a case where for similarly situated employees treating the said basic pay of Rs.12,840/- as on 1-1- 6 a different yard stick is being 7 WP No. 15759/2020 adopted. Be that as it may similar query with regard to fixation of pay for persons retiring after 1-1-1996 and similar question is already considered in the case of SPS Vains (Retd.) (supra) and in paras 26 and 27 disparity created and different differentia has been discussed and the law is laid down in the following manner.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 9 - S C Sharma - Full Document

Himachal Road Transport Corporation vs Himachal Road Transport Corporation ... on 22 February, 2021

Even in the case of Subrata Sen and others v. Union of India and others4, where a cut-off date was fixed for the purpose of applicability of revised pension scheme this Court has held that all retired employees constitute one homogeneous class and there cannot be cut-off date fixed to extend such benefits. All the above said cases which are referred to and relied on by the High Court are not relevant and cannot be pressed into service, to decide the issue which arises on the facts of this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 14 - R S Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next