Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Mansoor vs State Of Kerala on 20 September, 2016

Abdul Muthalib A.K vs The Regional Transport Officer ... on 27 July, 2020

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the Bar and taking note of the judgment of this Court in Mansoor v. State of Kerala - [2018 (1) KLT 50] and Writ Appeal No.220/2018 [State of Kerala v. Mohandas U.K. and Others], the writ petition is allowed by directing the respondent to receive tax from the petitioner in respect of the vehicle No.KL-16-Q-6333 based on the seating capacity of the vehicle and not on the basis of the floor area. The W.P.(C).No.12606/2020 :: 3 ::
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document

Shankari Premasenan vs State Of Kerala on 28 May, 2024

In the light of the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that if the petitioner makes a representation to the 2nd respondent for assessing the tax in respect of her vehicle on the basis of the seating capacity provided in the Schedule to the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same in the light of the decision in Mansoor (supra) and the judgment in W.A. No.220 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such representation.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M Purushothaman - Full Document

Sidhique vs State Of Kerala on 28 May, 2024

In the light of the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that if the petitioner makes a representation to the 2nd respondent for assessing the tax in respect of his vehicles on the basis of the seating capacity provided in the Schedule to the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same in the light of the decision in Mansoor (supra) and the judgment in W.A. No.220 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such representation.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M Purushothaman - Full Document

Rejith Kumar .M vs State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2024

In the light of the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that if the petitioner makes a representation to the 2 nd respondent for assessing the tax in respect of his vehicle on the basis of the seating capacity provided in the Schedule to the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, the 2 nd respondent shall consider the same in the light of the decision in Mansoor (supra) and the judgment in W.A. WP(C) NO. 19239 OF 2024 : 5 : No.220 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such representation.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M Purushothaman - Full Document

The Regional Transport Officer vs Nil on 16 March, 2020

3. Essentially the submission is that the Writ Petition was disposed of by this Court relying on the judgment of this Court in Mansoor v. State of Kerala1, which was confirmed by the Division Bench though on different grounds. It is pointed out that the petitioner had suppressed the fact that the vehicle in question was originally registered at Mangalore in the State of Karnataka and it was re-assigned and later transferred to the office of the Regional Transport Officer, Ernakulam with effect from 15.6.2019. It is submitted that in view of the above, the principles laid down in the said case have no application.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V R Vijayaraghavan - Full Document
1   2 Next