Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing Asha vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 22 August, 2014

Asha vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 March, 2026

3. It has been averred by the plaintiff, Smt Asha is the legally wedded wife of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Pyare Lal, R/o BG-6/355D, Block BG 6, Pachim Vihar, Delhi and plaintiff has been living with her family including her husband, Sh. Anil Kumar, her daughter Ms. Divya Kohli and her son Sh. Raju at the above stated address since 2007. That the husband of the plaintiff, Sh. Anil Kumar has been missing since 15.11.2010 as he had gone to Saharanpur, U.P. and from there he did not come back, and since then whereabouts of him is not known to anyone. That the plaintiff and her family put all there efforts to trace and search Sh. Anil Kumar from relatives and VIVEK friends but no clue was got about her husband, Sh. Anil Kumar. That KUMAR AGARWAL (Vivek Kumar Agarwal) Digitally signed by (JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge-02, West,THC), VIVEK KUMAR PAGE 3/18 23.03.2026 AGARWAL Date: 2026.03.23 16:45:38 +0530 CS SCJ 1245/23 ASHA Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI the plaintiff informed at the PS Janakpuri, Janpath, Distt. Saharanpur, U.P. about the missing of Sh. Anil Kumar and gave a written complaint dt. 15.11.2010, but all exercise proved futile and no result yielded. That the plaintiff ran from pillar to post, however, the office of the police also failed to traced out about the missing Sh. Anil Kumar despite the efforts made by the police and recorded the report in their PS that Sh. Anil Kumar is untraceable. 3.1. It is further stated that more than 7 years have now passed and till date the whereabouts of Sh. Anil Kumar is not know to anyone though efforts made and therefore the plaintiff and her family members have presumed that Sh. Anil Kumar is no more alive and continuous 7 years have been passed since 15.10.2010 Sh. Anil Kumar is missing and thereafter whereabouts are not known, therefore in the eye of law Sh. Anil Kumar is deemed/presumed to be dead person. That even the police has also not able to trace out about said Sh. Anil Kumar till date and the police of P.S. Janakpuri Janpath, Distt. Sharanpur has issued a untraceable report regarding the husband of the plaintiff.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kiran vs Govt. Of Nctd on 1 November, 2023

"14. As in the instant case the applicant is claiming age relaxation and also praying for quashing of the notice dated 10.9.2013, whereby her candidature for Post Code 02/13 was rejected by the respondent-DSSSB on the ground of her being overage, on the basis of the judgment dated 22.8.2014 passed in W.P. (C) No. 1035 of 2014 (Asha Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & others), it would be apposite to quote paragraphs 13 to 17 of the said judgment:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neelam Rani vs Govt. Of Nctd on 24 November, 2023

"14. As in the instant case the applicant is claiming age relaxation and also praying for quashing of the notice dated 10.9.2013, whereby her candidature for Post Code 02/13 was rejected by the respondent- DSSSB on the ground of her being overage, on the basis of the judgment dated 22.8.2014 passed in W.P. (C) No. 1035 of 2014 (Asha Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & others), it would be apposite to quote paragraphs 13 to 17 of the said judgment:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Meenakshi vs Govt. Of Nctd on 2 November, 2016

14. As in the instant case the applicant is claiming age relaxation and also praying for quashing of the notice dated 10.9.2013, whereby her candidature for Post Code 02/13 was rejected by the respondent-DSSSB on the ground of her being overage, on the basis of the judgment dated 22.8.2014 passed in W.P. (C) No. 1035 of 2014 (Asha Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & others), it would be apposite to quote paragraphs 13 to 17 of the said judgment:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs. Raj Bala vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 January, 2015

2. The Secretary Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board FC-18, Institutional Area, Karkardooma (Near Railway Reservation Center) Delhi-110092 ... Respondents Order (Oral) Shri A.K. Bhardwaj, M(J) Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants herein, namely, Mrs. Raj Bala, Mrs. Kavita Solanki and Mrs. Sunita Sharma are 37, 34 and 33 years old respectively and in terms of the view taken by the Honble High Court of Delhi in Asha v. Govt. Of NCT of Delhi & Ors. judgment dated 22nd August, 2014 passed in WP(C) 1035/2014, they are eligible for the post of Physical Education Teacher till attaining the age of 40 years.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next