Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.63 seconds)
Documents citing V.P. Arora vs Punjab National Bank on 31 October, 1991

Suresh Kumar vs Daryao Singh Kashyap And Anr on 24 January, 2019

Learned counsel for the appellant relies upon the judgment of the Delhi High Court in V.P. Arora versus Punjab National Bank 1992 (48) DLT 367 and the judgment of this High Court in Narender Singh versus Krishan and others 2017 (3) RCR (Civil) 225 to urge that in case there is only one residential house with the judgment debtor, the same should not be attached. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is ready and willing to return the amount, which is alleged to have been given to the appellant. It is, thus, prayed that this appeal be allowed, impugned judgment and decree dated 09.03.2017 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Karnal as well as judgment and decree dated 23.10.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 4 of 8 ::: Downloaded on - 17-02-2019 19:45:07 ::: RSA No. 14955 of 2018 (O&M) 5 Karnal be set aside and suit filed by the plaintiff - respondent No. 1 be dismissed throughout.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - L Gill - Full Document

Prem Gupta vs M/S Cimmco Limited & Ors. on 25 July, 2016

Consequentially, this Court is of the considered view that the trial court has rightly relied upon the decision in Yogesh Sharma (supra) and, so the impugned order cannot be faulted with as the decisions dealt with in preceding paragraph and in V.P. Arora (supra) are distinguishable and has no application to the facts of the instant case. Thus, finding no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order, this appeal and the pending applications are dismissed while leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Gaur - Full Document

N.V. Ramami vs The Government Of Canada on 15 May, 2025

27. It is contended that Mohinder Singh (supra) also discusses Sujata Kapoor (supra) and learned Division Bench of this Court observed that the attention of the Bench, which rendered decision in Sujata Kapoor (supra), was not drawn to the earlier judgment passed by this Court in V.P. Arora v. Punjab National Bank: 1991 SCC OnLine Del 581 wherein it was held that as long as the Judgement Debtor continued to be in CMI 6/2019 9 of 17 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:15.05.2025 19:54:18 possession of the attached property as his main residential house, such property would cease to be attached.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1