M.Sakubar Sadik .. Revision vs The State Rep. By
In the said case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that confession of the co-accused cannot be called in aid to frame the charge against the accused, in absence of any other evidence to do so. This verdict of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is followed by this court in case of Laxmi Koli Babita (supra) which is followed in Virbhadram Vyankanna Guggalot vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2008 avk 42/77 REVNS-383-2016-377-2016.doc ALL MR (Cri) 203. In order to give finding on this aspect, one will have to consider the remaining part of the evidence pressed in service against revision petitioner / accused no.4 Sumeet Bachewar, which according to the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor is regarding indulging in the criminal conspiracy with co-accused for liquidating Sunil Kumar Lahoria."