Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.89 seconds)

Special Deuputy Collector, Singareni ... vs Dasari Ramulu And Others on 22 February, 2000

13. The question determined in Mohanlal v. B.G. Deshmukh, AIR 1985 Bom. 188, is to the effect whether the Collector could determine on the application under Section 18 of the Act as to whether the applicant is a person interested or not which is not the question under consideration in hand. Consequently, the citation has only been noticed as it was cited at the Bar.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 19 - Cited by 6 - B Nazki - Full Document

Khazana Ram And Anr. vs Lac And Ors. on 27 December, 2006

5. In the present case, if the particulars under Section 19 had not been furnished, the reference should have been returned for furnishing the particulars in accordance with law and not to convert the proceedings before the Collector into a full-fledged trial. This is abdication of necessary judicial function by the Court which is impermissible in law. It is now well established that the proceedings before the Reference Court are judicial proceedings and the question as to whether a reference is competent or not is to be decided and disposed of by the learned District Judge and not by the Collector. Reference to be made to Patel Vashram Gopalbhai v. State of Gujarat and Mohanlal v. B.G. Deshmukh .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - D D Sud - Full Document
1