Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 153 (2.95 seconds)
Documents citing Rajesh Awasthi vs Nand Lal Jaiswal & Ors on 19 October, 2012

Dr. Ashutosh Mishra vs Indian Institute Of Mass Communication ... on 6 November, 2020

"5. It is a settled law that a writ of quo warranto can be sought only if there is found to be violation of a statutory provision. This is so held by the Supreme Court in its various judgments and two such judgments are in the cases of B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board Employees' Assn. and Others, (2006) 11 SCC 731(2) and Rajesh Awasthi Vs. Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501.
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Utility Users' Welfare Association vs State Of Gujarat & 12....Opponent(S) on 8 October, 2015

45. The reliance placed by the learned Advocate General appearing for the State upon the decision Page 69 of 74 HC-NIC Page 69 of 74 Created On Fri Oct 09 01:59:23 IST 2015 C/WPPIL/172/2014 CAV JUDGMENT of the Apex Court in the case of Rajesh Awasthi Vs. Nand Lal Jaiswal and Ors., reported (2013) 1 SCC, 501 as well as another decision of the Apex Court in the case of West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs. CESC Ltd., reported in 2002(8) SCC, 714 are of no help to the respondent State, inasmuch as in the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Rajesh Awasthi Vs. Nand Lal Jaiswal and Ors. (supra), the question was about the appointment issuance of writ of quo warranto against the person, who was selected by the selection committee under the Act and various aspects to be borne in mind by the selection committee at the time of recommending the name. The Apex Court found that it was obligatory for the selection committee to satisfy itself that the selected candidates had no financial interest or other interest, which was likely to affect prejudicially his function as Chairperson and it was found that the selection was vitiated on account of non-compliance with the statutory prescription and the decision of the High Court to set aside the selection was not interfered with. In the said case before the Apex Court, Page 70 of 74 HC-NIC Page 70 of 74 Created On Fri Oct 09 01:59:23 IST 2015 C/WPPIL/172/2014 CAV JUDGMENT the question did not arise for consideration of the constitutional validity of Section 84(1) and Section 84(2) of the Act and the consideration of the role of selection committee under Section 85 vis-a-vis the provisions of Sections 84(1) and (2).
Gujarat High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 2 - J Patel - Full Document

Ramshankar Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Kumud Kumar Shukla vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Kumud Kumar Shukal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Maan Singh Uikey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Ku. Vibha Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Rakesh Pandey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2024

The Apex Court in Rajesh Awasthi versus Nand Lal Jaiswal & Others (2013) 1 SCC 501 has categorically noted that a writ of quo warranto will lie when appointment is made contrary to the statutory provisions. In the present case, since appointment has been made contrary to the statutory provisions, writ petition is maintainable challenging the such illegal appointments.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next