Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing The Manager, Pnb vs Ajay Kumar Sharma & Others on 5 April, 2012

Punjab National Bank vs Sh. Mukul Sharma on 16 August, 2022

19. As per the statement of accounts Ex. PW1/I (Colly), the last payment made by defendant no. 1 of Rs. 4.00 lakhs was on 11.07.2017 leaving an outstanding balance of Rs. 2,30,262/- in respect of loan account no. 112000LH00000084 (housing loan). The last payment of Rs. 28,240/- in respect of loan account no. 11200095000001364 (overdraft facility loan) was made on 20.02.2017 by the defendant no. 1. This suit for recovery has been filed on 17.03.2020. Though there were two loans and two accounts were opened by the defendant no.1 with the plaintiff but the plaintiff in the present suit for recovery, has consolidated the amounts which is not permissible as per law. It appears that both the loans have been consolidated to bring the case for recovery in respect of second loan within the period CS (Comm) No. 326/20 PNB & VS. Mukul Sharma & Ors Page No.11 of 18 of limitation though barred by limitation. I am of the view that the recovery with respect to loan no. 11200095000001364 is barred by limitation being beyond the period of three years as provided under the Limitation Act, 1963.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj Kumar vs Sr.Regional Manager Punjab National ... on 16 October, 2024

2. THE BANK HAS REGULARIZED THE JUNIORS TO THE PETITIONER AS SWEEPER IN THE BANK It is submitted that the two juniors to the Petitioner who were similarly situated, have been regularized by the bank. In the list of seniority one Smt. Meena has been regularized. In this connection reference may be made to Letter dated 12.03.2007 issued to Zonal Manager of the Bank by the Chief Manager (Page -14, Annexure P12 of CM No.19703/2010) That apart one Sh. Ajay Kumar has been regularized in the year 2015. (Kindly refer Page 19, Annexure P-3 in CM No.13972/2017 in WP (C) No.4770/2007). It is further submitted that Ajay Kumar had succeeded before LD CGIT, Delhi and the Bank had challenged the said Award before this Hon‟ble Court vide WP No.6166/2008, PNB Vs Ajay Kumar. However, the Bank has withdraw the Writ Petition Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 4770/2007 & W.P.(C) 5770/2007 Page 6 of 42 Digitally Signed By:GAURAV SHARMA Signing Date:18.10.2024 20:14:16 No.6166 /2008 and has regularized the service of Ajay Kumar as sweeper.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - C D Singh - Full Document

Punjab National Bank vs Manoj Kumar on 16 October, 2024

2. THE BANK HAS REGULARIZED THE JUNIORS TO THE PETITIONER AS SWEEPER IN THE BANK It is submitted that the two juniors to the Petitioner who were similarly situated, have been regularized by the bank. In the list of seniority one Smt. Meena has been regularized. In this connection reference may be made to Letter dated 12.03.2007 issued to Zonal Manager of the Bank by the Chief Manager (Page -14, Annexure P12 of CM No.19703/2010) That apart one Sh. Ajay Kumar has been regularized in the year 2015. (Kindly refer Page 19, Annexure P-3 in CM No.13972/2017 in WP (C) No.4770/2007). It is further submitted that Ajay Kumar had succeeded before LD CGIT, Delhi and the Bank had challenged the said Award before this Hon‟ble Court vide WP No.6166/2008, PNB Vs Ajay Kumar. However, the Bank has withdraw the Writ Petition Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 4770/2007 & W.P.(C) 5770/2007 Page 6 of 42 Digitally Signed By:GAURAV SHARMA Signing Date:18.10.2024 20:14:16 No.6166 /2008 and has regularized the service of Ajay Kumar as sweeper.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - C D Singh - Full Document
1