Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Sri Jalemu Rajendra Prasad vs A on 5 December, 2025

In AIR 2002 Madras 340 = 2002-2-L.W.513, (K.Manokaran Vs. A. U.Subbannan) this Court while dealing with the above said provisions, has held that there is nothing in the code which would indicate or compel the executing Court either to give an opportunity to the judgment debtor or the decree holder to adduce evidence to have a full-fledged enquiry and record its reasons in writing before passing an order of arrest against the judgment debtor. It is also stated that adjudication order without a protection order does not prevent the judgment debtors arrest and it is the duty of the Court to require him to give security under Section 55(4) CPC.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Saravanan vs E.Raju on 6 November, 2008

In AIR 2002 Madras 340, (K.Manokaran Vs. A.U.Subbannan) this Court while dealing with the above said provisions, has held that there is nothing in the code which would indicate or compel the executing Court either to give an opportunity to the judgment debtor or the decree holder to adduce evidence to have a full-fledged enquiry and record its reasons in writing before passing an order of arrest against the judgment debtor. It is also stated that adjudication order without a protection order does not prevent the judgment debtors arrest and it is the duty of the Court to require him to give security under Section 55(4) CPC.
Madras High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Palanivelu - Full Document
1