Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing Mr.Om Prakash vs Dtc, Gnct Delhi on 1 July, 2010

Om Prakash vs Dtc on 28 March, 2013

In tune with the defence brought out in 6/9 Om Prakash Vs DTC written statement and put to PW-1 by way of suggestions, the defence witness deposed firmly in his evidentary affidavit that the plaintiff was not entitled to incentives of Rs. 50/- per day as he was appointed as vehicle examiner vide notification EX.PW-2/1 which comes under the category of drivers thereby bringing the plaintiff beyond the purview of notification EX.PW-2/3 whereby employees working in other categories were given the duty of drivers in lieu of their own duty who were entitled to incentive of Rs. 50/- per day. The plaintiff did not challenge the defendant's version as stated in the affidavit as even a specfic suggestion to negate the same was not put to the defendant's witness. Thus the defence version has gone unrebutted which amounts to admission of defendant's case by the plaintiff and thus falsifies the plaintiff's case. In view of aforesaid discussion, it is clear that plaintiff has failed to establish that he is entitled to incentive of Rs. 50/- per day. Thus, this issue is decided in favour of defendant and against the plaintiff.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Between The vs The on 9 May, 2018

PRONOUNCED IN OPEN ATUL Digitally signed by ATUL KUMAR COURT ON 09.05.2018 KUMAR GARG Date: 2018.06.01 GARG 14:46:37 +0530 (ATUL KUMAR GARG) RESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT-XVI/ SOUTH WEST DISTRICT, DWARKA COURTS, NEW DELHI. LIR No. 2043/16, Om Prakash Vs DTC                                                   09.05.2018                                                       Page No. 15 of 15        LIR No. 2043/16, Om Prakash Vs DTC 09.05.2018 Present: Sh. Ashok Kumar Mishra, AR for the management. Vide my order dictated and announced in the open court,
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1