Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Kerala vs The Central Pollution Control Board on 17 September, 2021

St.Jude Granites vs The Director Of Mining And Geology on 3 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. Ext.P8 order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice by way of publication to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for WP(C) NO. 20671 OF 2020 AND CON.CASES 8 quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

James Granites (P) Ltd vs The District Geologist on 19 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. WP(C) NO. 25861 OF 2021 4 From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

K.P.Hassan vs The Geologist on 19 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of W.P.(C).No.7593/21 4 respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

M/S. Oriental Rock Products Pvt Ltd vs The Director on 19 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance WP(C) NO. 24711 OF 2021 4 criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

Kuttikadan Granites vs The Village Officer on 23 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the WP(C) NO. 26312 OF 2021 4 learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

Ottappalam Taluk Karinkal Quarry ... vs The District Geologist, Palakkad on 25 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the WP(C) NO. 26538 OF 2021 4 learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

Krishnankutty V vs The District Geologist on 25 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the WP(C) NO. 26517 OF 2021 4 learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

Al Fathima Crusher India Pvt. Ltd vs State Environmental Impact Assessment ... on 25 November, 2021

3. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. WP(C) NO. 26512 OF 2021 4 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

Thomas C.P vs The District Geologist on 23 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the WP(C) NO. 26238 OF 2021 4 learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document

Abhilash vs The District Geologist on 24 November, 2021

4. The writ petitions were finally heard and allowed by judgment dated 21.12.2020. The order of the NGT was set aside and the NGT was directed to dispose of the representations of respondents 3 to 115 afresh after notice, by way of publication, to those who are affected by the prescription of the stringent distance criteria for permission for quarrying. The said judgment is WP(C) NO. 26425 OF 2021 4 reported in State of Kerala v. Central Pollution Control Board [2021 (1) KLT 1]. From the said judgment, an appeal had been preferred and the directions of the learned Single Judge had been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, SLPs have been filed before the Apex Court and Civil Appeals had been disposed of by proceedings dated 25.10.2021.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sivaraman - Full Document
1   2 3 Next