Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Hem Chand And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 27 May, 1993

Surender Kumar vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 March, 2020

It is not disputed that no departmental enquiry has been initiated against the petitioner. The question is whether continuation of suspension is lawful and in the interest of administration. The government is paying the subsistence allowance without taking work from a person who is facing trial for abetment to suicide which is grave but is not an office misdemeanor or misconduct or has anything to do with his employment. Mr. Vohra has placed reliance on a short and crisp order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Hem 2 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 15-03-2020 08:35:16 ::: CWP No. 2718-2016 3 Chander Vs. State of Haryana and others, 1995 (1) RSJ 266, which reads as follows:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document

Meena Goyal vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 17 October, 1997

3. During the course of investigation 28 persons, co-accused in the case, applied to the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, for bail Under Section 438 Cr. P.C. but their application was dismissed on 14.8.1996. Thereafter the said 28 persons approached this Court for anticipatory bail Under Section 438 Cr. P.C. in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 4400/96 Khem Chand and 27 Ors. v. State but this Court too dismissed their application on 17.9.1996.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1