citedby: 647664

Onkar Chand S/O Govind Ram vs Union Territory Of Jammu & Kashmir on 23 February, 2023

In 1980 SLJ 31 (Assad Ullah Khan & Ors. Vs. State) relied by Ld. Counsel for the applicants,High Court of Jammu & Kashmir granted bail to accused persons in rape case us/s 376 RPC namely Akram who was not alleged to have committed offence of rape and other accused „Rajab‟ who was below sixteen (16) years of age.

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M Lal - Full Document

Daljit Singh Sasan vs Union Territory Of Jammu And on 1 August, 2024

37. It is a trite that two paramount considerations viz: likelihood of accused fleeing from justice and his tampering with prosecution evidence relate to the ensuring of fair trial of the case in a court of justice, It is essential that due and proper weightage should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others. The requirements as to bail are merely to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial (Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; G. Nara Simhula vs. Public Prosecutor Andhra Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 429; Assad Ullah Khan and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir SLJ 1980 J&K 31; Jeet Ram and etc. etc. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh 2003 Cr. Law Journal 736).

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vasu Sharma & Ors vs Respondent(S) on 14 August, 2024

25. It is a trite that two paramount considerations viz: likelihood of accused fleeing from justice and his tampering with prosecution evidence relate to the ensuring of fair trial of the case in a court of justice, It is essential that due and proper weightage should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others. The requirements as to bail are merely to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial (Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; G. Nara Simhula vs. Public Prosecutor Andhra Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 429; Assad Ullah Khan and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir SLJ 1980 J&K 31; Jeet Ram and etc. etc. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh 2003 Cr. Law Journal 736).

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohd. Iqbal & Ors vs Respondent(S) on 23 October, 2024

16. It is a trite that two paramount considerations viz: likelihood of accused fleeing from justice and his tampering with prosecution evidence relate to the ensuring of fair trial of the case in a court of justice, It is essential that due and proper weightage should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others. The requirements as to bail are merely to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial (Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi 9 Bail App No. 206/2022 Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; G. Nara Simhula vs. Public Prosecutor Andhra Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 429; Assad Ullah Khan and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir SLJ 1980 J&K 31; Jeet Ram and etc. etc. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh 2003 Cr. Law Journal 736).

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mehmood Ur Rayaz Bhat vs Respondent(S) on 23 October, 2024

14. It is a trite that two paramount considerations viz: likelihood of accused fleeing from justice and his tampering with prosecution evidence relate to the ensuring of fair trial of the case in a court of justice, It is essential that due and proper weightage should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others. The requirements as to bail are merely to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial (Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; G. Nara Simhula vs. Public Prosecutor Andhra Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 429; Assad Ullah Khan and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir SLJ 1980 J&K 31; Jeet Ram and etc. etc. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh 2003 Cr. Law Journal 736).

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohammad Azam & Ors vs Respondent(S) on 23 October, 2024

14. It is a trite that two paramount considerations viz: likelihood of accused fleeing from justice and his tampering with prosecution evidence relate to the ensuring of fair trial of the case in a court of justice, It is essential that due and proper weightage should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others. The requirements as to bail are merely to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial (Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; G. Nara Simhula vs. Public Prosecutor Andhra Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 429; Assad Ullah Khan and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir SLJ 1980 J&K 31; Jeet Ram and etc. etc. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh 2003 Cr. Law Journal 736).

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Naresh Kumar Gulia vs Directorate Of Enforcement And Anr on 15 July, 2025

13. It is a trite that two paramount considerations viz: likelihood of accused fleeing from justice and his tampering with prosecution evidence relate to the ensuring of fair trial of the case in a court of justice, It is essential that due and proper weightage should be bestowed on these two factors apart from others. The requirements as to bail are 17 merely to secure the attendance of the accused at the trial (Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; G. Nara Simhula vs. Public Prosecutor Andhra Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 429; Assad Ullah Khan and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir SLJ 1980 J&K 31; Jeet Ram and etc. etc. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh 2003 Cr. Law Journal 736).