Unknown vs Indian Council Of Agricultural ... on 28 January, 2015
7. Per contra, Shri R.K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondents vehemently opposed the prayer of the applicant and he submitted that in view of the decision taken by the Body of the respondent-Institute the matter was re-considered and it was decided to withdraw the advertisement and to appoint respondent no.3 on transfer, who had already been declared as surplus. He placed reliance upon a judgments passed in the case of State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander & Others, 1974 (1) SCR 165, Miss Neelima Shangla v. State of Haryana & Others, (1986) 4 SCC 268, Jitendra Kumar and Others v. State of Punjab and others, 1985 (1) SCR 899 and an order passed by this Tribunal in the case of Jaiveer v. Union of India & Others, OA no.603-HR-2013, decided on 18.03.2014.