Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 406 (1.14 seconds)
Documents citing Shivalingappa Kallayanappa And Others vs State Of Karnataka on 31 August, 1994

Ranjit vs State Of U.P. on 16 January, 2020

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka MANU/SC/0053/1995 : 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235, this Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - D K Upadhyaya - Full Document

Ratan Lal And Others vs State Of U.P. on 23 April, 2025

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694, the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

B. Chandrasekhar vs State Of A.P. Through Public ... on 21 September, 2007

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka the Supreme Court found that A4 and A5 were armed with sticks and dealt blows only on the legs and on the hands which were not serious. A3 did not participate in the attack. Although they had been convicted under Section 302 r/w. 149 IPC, but the Supreme Court convicted A3 to A5 under Section 326 r/w. 149 IPC.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - B Nazki - Full Document

Bala Shankar vs State Of U.P. on 13 August, 2025

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694, the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

Krishna Kumar Singh @ Bhondal And Ors. vs State Of U.P. on 13 August, 2025

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694, the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

Raj Kumar @ Babli And Others vs State Of U.P. on 13 August, 2025

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694, the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

Mallanna S/O Narsappa Erators vs The State Through Chittapur P.S. on 8 September, 2020

24. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant had relied upon the judgment of this Court in Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka (1994 Supp (3) 235) to contend that they could not be charged or convicted for an offence under Section 302 with the aid of Section 34 IPC. The said judgment has rightly been distinguished by the High Court in the judgment under appeal. In that case, the Supreme Court had considered the role of each individual and recorded a finding that there was no common object on the part of the accused to commit murder. In that case, the Court was primarily concerned with the common object falling within the ambit of Section 149 IPC. In fact, Section 34 IPC has not even been referred to in the afore referred judgment of this Court.
Karnataka High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 0 - H Sanjeevkumar - Full Document

Kaptan Singh vs State Of U.P. on 5 November, 2019

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka [1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694] the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 5 - P Diwaker - Full Document

Attar Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. on 16 May, 2025

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694, the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

Sita Nath And Others vs State Of U.P. on 8 September, 2025

In Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1694, the Court has held that the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of his evidence on the basis of major contradictions and discrepancies, for the reason that his presence on the scene stands established in case it is proved that he suffered the injury during the said incident.
Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next