Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Jaika Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur And ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Another on 7 August, 1992

Rashid Mohd. Etc. vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 20 December, 1993

21. Our attention was also drawn to a decision of the Bombay High Court given in the case of Jaika Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1993 Bombay 124. There also the provisions of the Maharashtra Act was challenged and that was also repelled by that Court. In that case also, after examining all the provisions of the Maharashtra Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into local Areas Act, the Court held that the State Legislature is competent to impose this tax under Entry 52 of the State List and provisions are not ultra vires of Article 14 or any other provisions of the Constitution of India.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 42 - Cited by 3 - A K Mathur - Full Document

Keshav Manikrao Bagal vs The State Of Mah And Ors on 3 April, 2018

10. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jaika Vanijya Ltd. Nagpur Vs State of Maharashtra" (cited supra) has already considered this point and held that the interested person has to serve a notice on the Planning Authority, Development Authority or the appropriate authority, as the case may be and it has to state that despite its reservation and after coming into force of final Development Plan for 10 years the land has not been acquired. The owner is not required by Section 127 to call upon the Authority to take steps to acquire the land within stipulated period. The Authority on which notice is served, is aware of statutory obligations cast upon it thereby. If it fails to acquire the land within the said period of service of notice or then fails to take steps towards acquisition within the said period, the reservation is deemed to have lapsed.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

Hemant Bhagwat Kolhe vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 19 March, 2024

In spite of furnishing the requisite information and document no steps are taken by Respondent No.4 under the provisions of MRTP Act. The Petitioners claim that in view of provisions of Section 127 of the Act, the reservation on the Petitioners' land stands lapsed as in the period of two years after the service of notice steps are not taken by the Municipal Corporation towards the acquisition of the land. With these averments, Petition is filed seeking declaration that the land in question is free from encumbrance of reservation and further direction is sought to the Respondents to notify the lapsing of reservation by public notification in official gazette under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners place reliance on the judgment of this Court in case of Jaika Vanijya Ltd., Nagpur and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, 2013(4) Mh.L.J. 161.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R V Ghuge - Full Document
1