Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1602 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing Shail Sahni vs Sanjeev Kumar And Ors. on 5 February, 2014

Mrakshay Kumar Malhotra vs Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India on 6 June, 2014

5. The information sought by the applicant regarding the status of his complaints with the Vodafone company regarding UCC, as discussed above, clearly falls within the regulatory powers exercised by the TRAI and thus there can be no reason which prevents the TRAI from gathering the information from the service provider and providing the same to the applicant. None of the arguments except that of bulky and voluminous information sought by applicant weighing down on limited manpower resources of the public authority therefore seems to hold any merit. The Respondent have pleaded that the TRAI has limited manpower of only 168 employees and lacks the wherewithal to handle individual complaints. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in its decision dated 05.02.2014 [WP (C) No. 845/2014 Shail Sahni vs. Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.] has held as hereunder:
Central Information Commission Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrvishal Saini vs University Grants Commission on 19 February, 2016

9. While   placing   reliance   upon   Shail   Sahni   Vs.   Sanjeev   Kumar   and   Ors,   W.P.   (C)  845/2014, it was further observed that "misuse of RTI Act has to be appropriately dealt with,  otherwise   the   public   would   lose   faith   and   confidence   in   this   "sunshine Act".   A   beneficent  statute, when made a tool for mischief and abuse must be checked in accordance with law."
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrvishal Saini vs University Grants Commission on 19 February, 2016

9. While   placing   reliance   upon   Shail   Sahni   Vs.   Sanjeev   Kumar   and   Ors,   W.P.   (C)  845/2014, it was further observed that "misuse of RTI Act has to be appropriately dealt with,  otherwise   the   public   would   lose   faith   and   confidence   in   this   "sunshine Act".   A   beneficent  statute, when made a tool for mischief and abuse must be checked in accordance with law."
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrvishal Saini vs University Grants Commission on 19 February, 2016

9. While   placing   reliance   upon   Shail   Sahni   Vs.   Sanjeev   Kumar   and   Ors,   W.P.   (C)  845/2014, it was further observed that "misuse of RTI Act has to be appropriately dealt with,  otherwise   the   public   would   lose   faith   and   confidence   in   this   "sunshine Act".   A   beneficent  statute, when made a tool for mischief and abuse must be checked in accordance with law."
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next