Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Emperor vs Bai Jiba on 2 August, 1917

Emperor vs Mana Gendal on 13 June, 1930

In that connection I may refer to Emperor v. Bai Jiba . The ease before us now is a case of fracture of the bones of the skull. The evidence of the Doctor who held the post mortem on the deceased shows that there were contusions one on the right side of the forehead and one on the left side of the scalp ; and on dissection beneath these contusions, it was found that the frontal and both the parietal bones were fractured into several pieces, and the skull cap was depressed at various places pressing the substance of the brain. There was also an incised wound on the forehead, but the Doctor's opinion was that death was due to the fracture of the skull bones and the consequent injuries to the brain.
Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mana Gendal And Ors. vs Emperor on 13 June, 1930

In that connection I may refer to Emperor v. Bui Jiba 42 Ind. Cas. 754 : 19 Bom. L.R. 823 : 18 Cr.L.J. 1010. The case before us now is a, case of fracture of the bones of the skull. The evidence of the Doctor who held the post mortem on the deceased shows that there were contusions one on the right side of the forehead and one on the left side of the scalp; and on dissection beneath these contusions it was found that the frontal and both the parietal bones were fractured into several pieces, and the skull cap was depressed at various places pressing the substance of the brain. There was also an incised wound on the forehead, but the Doctor's opinion was that death was due to the fracture of the skull bones and the consequent injuries to the brain.
Bombay High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1