Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.50 seconds)
Documents citing Shankrabhai Kalabhai Rabari vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 30 March, 2015

Ashokbhai Kanubhai Ravani & vs State Of Gujarat & on 5 May, 2017

33.   The   same   view   has   been   reiterated   in   the  decisions   reported   in   State   (NCT   of   Delhi)   v.  Sanjay,   Jaysukh   Bavanji     Shingalia   v.   State   of  Gujarat and another, Malabhai Shalabhai Rabari and  others   v.   State   of             Gujarat   and   others,  Kalubhai Dulabhai Khachar v. State of Gujarat and  another and Sondabhai Hanubhai Bharwad v. State of  Gujarat  and   another  (2014   (9)   SCC  772),  where  it   has been observed that provisions under the Mines  and Mineral  (Development              and    Regulation)  Act,       1957 is only barring investigation of an  offence   under   Section   4(1­A)   read   with   section  21(1) of MMDR Act and Magistrate taking cognizance  of the offence if it is an offence otherwise under  the Indian Penal Code that will not be a bar for  the police to investigate and file final report and  Magistrate   taking   cognizance   of   the   offence   for  that offence.   It is clear from the provisions of  the General Clauses Act that if the act committed  is   an   offence   under   two   enactments,   there   is  nothing  barring for  proceeding  against them  under  two    enactments but they cannot be sentenced for  the same separately. Further if they are distinct  and   different   offence,   then   there   is   no   bar   for  Page 54 of 74 HC-NIC Page 54 of 74 Created On Sat May 06 01:23:41 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/6991/2014 CAV JUDGMENT imposing separate sentence as well as it will not  amount to double jeopardy as provided under Article   20(2) of the Constitution of India.
Gujarat High Court Cites 118 - Cited by 0 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Bakorbhai Bababhai Patel vs Revenue Secretary (Appeals) on 3 January, 2024

4.3 Learned advocate Mr. Kothari relied upon two unreported decisions of this Court in the case of Rabari Shankarbhai Shaklabhai v. State of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No.15056 of 2019 dated 9.2.2022 and decision in the case of Bhavubhai Gandabhai Koli v. State of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No.6892 of 2021 dated 16.3.2022 where in similar set of facts, this Court quashed and set aside the orders passed by the revenue authorities whereby the transaction Page 4 of 13 Downloaded on : Fri Jan 05 20:39:04 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1139/2016 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/01/2024 undefined was held to be in breach of the Fragmentation Act and was held invalid.
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - N S Desai - Full Document

Balappa Rama Dhanagar vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 January, 2019

3. The main contention of the petitioner in this case is that he has not committed any of the offence as alleged against him and there is a bar under Section 22 of the Act and the Rules and the complainant suo moto registered the case and invoked the offences under the Act and the Rules. The counsel also relied upon the judgment reported in AIR 2015 SC 75 in the case of State of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sanjay with Jaysukh Bavanji 4 Shingalia Vs. State of Gujarat and Another with Malabhai Shalabhai Rabari & Others Vs. State of Gujarat & Others with Kalubhai Dulabhai Khachar Vs. State of Gujarat & Another, wherein it is held that there is bar to take cognizance and only on a private complaint filed by the Authorized Officer the Court can take the cognizance. Hence, the petition is liable to be quashed.
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - H P Sandesh - Full Document
1