Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing Kirpal Singh Jolly vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 25 November, 1974

Indravadan H. Shah vs State Of Gujarat And Anr. on 17 December, 1984

11. Mr. Mehta in this connection has invited our attention to the Judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Kirpal Singh v. The State of Punjab, 1969 Service Law Reporter p. 120. There the point decided is quiet distinct. The relaxation of age limit at the whim of the selection Board was stated to be unsustainable and it is obviously so. At any rate, in view of what we have observed above in the light of the well-known facts pertaining to the judicial administration in the State, the said authority can lend little assistance.
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Konjengbam Ibopishak Singh vs Ahongsangbam Sanakhomba Singh And Ors. on 14 December, 1984

However, the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kirpal Singh v. State of Punjab, 1975 Cri LJ 1422 had an occasion to deal with the provision of Section 146(2) Cr. P.C. when it was observed that if the Magistrate was of opinion that none of the parties was in possession or was unable to decide as to which of them was in possession of the subject of dispute in a proceeding under Section 145 he could attach the subject of dispute and draw up a statement of fact and forward the record of the proceedings to a civil Court of competent jurisdiction to decide the question whether any and which of the parties was in possession of the subject of dispute. Indeed, in this case also the scope merely of Sub-section (4) and not of Sub-section (5) of Section 145 only came up for consideration of the Court.
Gauhati High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Dr.Christopher Asir vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 25 July, 2008

(d)In 1975 Criminal Law Journal 1422 (Punjab and Haryana High Court) (Kirpal Singh Jolly Vs. State of Punjab and others) it has been held that where the record of the proceedings under Section 145 showed that the dispute was concerning the management and funds of the College and not the College building which was already in possession of the first party, Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, would not apply.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Selvam - Full Document
1