Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.48 seconds)

V Vijayalakshmi vs M/O Defence on 5 April, 2019

L. As was stated earlier, fixing of pay scales is the domain of the pay commission and it is best left to the commission to decide since they have the requisite expertise. This Tribunal cannot sit on judgment of the wisdom of the pay commission. The recommended grade pay for TO (A) is Rs.4600 by the Pay Commission and it has to be honoured. It would be pertinent to bring on record one another verdict of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in regard to recommendations of the pay commission in State of Bihar v. Bihar Veterinary Assn.,(2008) 11 SCC 60, wherein it was held as under:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Bihar & Anr vs Bihar State Basic Health Worke on 4 December, 2008

(unederlining ours) 15 The Supreme Court also considered this question in the case of State of Bihar & others Vs. Bihar Veterinary Association and others (2008(2) PLJR(SC) 176) and observed that disturbing the recommendation of the pay scale shall have cascading effect and the Court in exercise of its power of judicial review shall be slow to do that.
Patna High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - C K Prasad - Full Document

Namrata Singh vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences on 24 March, 2011

This well established principle of law was reiterated in State of Bihar & Ors vs. Bihar Veterinary Association & Ors [(2008) 2 SCC (L&S) 111]. In this case a mechanical application of the principle of equal pay for equal work was not favoured; besides the adverse consequences by way of the possible cascading effects and multiple litigations were also taken note by the Honble Apex Court.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Rabindra Nath Basu vs Union Of India Represented Through The on 16 May, 2011

(i) It has been ruled by Honble Supreme court that the recommendations of an expert body which include the pay scales recommended by Pay Commissions should not be disturbed as the same depend on several factors and the balancing so done by the expert bodies if disturbed would lead to a cascading effect. (State of Bihar vs. Bihar Vetrinary Association, AA No.1507 of 2008 decided on 22.02.2008). (Annexure-6).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Sumitava Mitra & Ors vs National Jute Manufactures ... on 27 August, 2009

On the other hand, deriving support and strength from a Division Bench decision of this Court in the case between State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Bihar Veterinary Association & Ors., as reported in (2008) 11 SCC 60, it was submitted on behalf of the respondents that Courts should not ordinarily upset the recommendation of the expert bodies as that has a cascading effect leading to multifarious litigation.
Calcutta High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next