Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.75 seconds)
Documents citing Ongc Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 12 June, 2014

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd, ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 23 February, 2023

On a perusal of the aforesaid position of law, we are of the considered view, that pursuant to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of ONGC Vs. Chief Commissioner, Central Excise (supra) as was applicable at the relevant point of time when the department had filed the present appeal i.e. on 04.06.2008, it was obligatory on the part of the Tribunal to have demanded a clearance from the CoD, and in absence of 25 South Eastern Coalfields Group of cases such clearance it was obligated not to have proceeded with any further on the said matter.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Raipur Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

U.P. Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 21 August, 2014

14. An OM dated 22.01.2004 was issued by the Government of India to revise and consolidate various guidelines, which were issued from time to time with respect to the PMA. The said OM dated 22.01.2004 also contained provision for clearance from CoD which had been set up pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court in ONGC v. Collector of Central Excise (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Uco Bank vs National Textile Corporation Ltd. on 5 March, 2020

17. As noted it is contended by the learned senior counsel for the appellant the liability was that of M/s Shri Sitaram Mills Ltd. and the claim put forth by the appellant herein is due to the fact that the said Shree Sitaram Mills was taken over by the respondents and in that circumstance the liability also is taken over and is to be liquidated. It is in that premise since the respondent is a Public Sector Enterprise and the appellant is also a Public Sector Bank which was nationalized under the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 the Office Memorandum dated 22.01.2004 was applicable and, therefore, the claim was put forth before the PMA. The reason for which the PMA was brought into existence due to the observations of this Page 16 of 25 Court in the case of ONGC vs. Collector of Central Excise was referred in detail.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - A S Bopanna - Full Document

Central Warehousing Corporation vs Govt Of India And Ors on 31 May, 2022

9.5 Based on the recommendation of the CACLB, the Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, issued the Notification dated 17.11.2006, prohibiting the employment of the contract labour in the works of handling of import and export containers and cargo, their loading and unloading from road vehicles and their stuffing, destuffing in Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHALOO BATRA Signing Date:01.06.2022 14:44:26 LPA 172/2021 & LPA 173/2021 Page 8 of 45 and from containers in the establishment of the appellant/CWC from the date of publication of the Notification dated 17.11.2006. 9.6 Aggrieved of the above Notification dated 17.11.2006, the appellant/CWC challenged the same before this Court by way of a writ petition, being W.P.(C) 2849 of 2007. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 24.04.2007, with the observation that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in ONGC v. Collector of Central Excise1, the disputes are first to be raised before a High-Powered Committee for appropriate clearance.
Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next