Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.47 seconds)

Reliance Retail Ltd vs Shailendrakumar Narsinbhai Solanki on 3 May, 2023

12.1 The Ld. District Commission has rightly relied on the judgment Hotel Nyay Mandir Vs Inshvarlal Jinabhai Desai on 14th December, 2010.NCDRC RP No. 550 of 2006 .....Besides, the District Forum had also directed the petitioner/opposite party no.1 to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to be deposited in a Consumer Welfare Fund within a period of 30 days.....
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.L.Verma S/O Godhan Lal Verama vs I.R.C.R.T.C. on 26 May, 2016

The plain reading of the above clearly speaks that the provision applies to the eventualities where the consumers could not be identified. Here in the present case the complainant-appellant has come with a case that consumers are clearly ascertainable hence, no relief could be granted under section 14 (1) (hb) of the Consumer Protection Act. The consumer has placed reliance on I (2006) CPJ 521 Hotel Nyay Mandir Vs. Ishwarlal Jinabhai Desai where a fine distinction has been explained under section 12 (1) (c) and 14 (1) (hb) of the Consumer Protection Act where the consumers are definite then after seeking permission a complaint under representative capacity could be filed but section 14 (1) (hb) would attract only when large body of consumers are effected who could not be ascertained which is not the case here. Hence, the contention of the appellant is not sustainable and so also the appeal.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1