Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)
Documents citing B.R. Ramanujachariar vs T.V. Kailasam Iyer on 8 January, 1925

A.M. Rangachariar vs Venkataswami Chetty on 10 September, 1934

for the same offence the accused was charged in E.C. No. 378 of 1933, and the order of the Court dated 3rd March 1933 which decided that case showed that the accused had been acquitted. The Court held that the accused was not liable to be tried again for the same offence in view of Section 403, Criminal P.C. and the ruling reported in Ramanujachariar v. Kailasam Iyer 1925 Mad. 1067.
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

A.M. Rangachariar vs Venkatasami Chetty on 10 September, 1934

1. The petitioner contends that the order of the 1st Class Bench Magistrate's Court, Conjeevaram, dated October 31, 1933, discharging the respondent is contrary to law. The petitioner admitted during his examination as P.W. No. 1 in that Court that "for the same offence the accused was charged in B.C. No. 378 of 1933", and the order of the Court dated March 3, 1933, which decided that case showed that the accused had been acquitted. The Court held that the accused was not liable to be tried again for the same offence in view of Section 403, Criminal Procedure Code, and the ruling reported in Ramanujachariar v. Kailasam Iyer 87 Ind. Cas. 969 : 48 M. 870 : (1932) M.W.N. 472 : 49 M.L.J. 386 : 26 Cr. L.J. 1049 : A.I.R. 1925 Mad. 1067 : 22 L.W. 736.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1