Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India , Mohanan , P.I. Mohd. ... vs Union Of India & Others P. Sathikumarana ... on 29 April, 1997

Subhash Chandra Aggarwal vs New Delhi Municipal Council on 25 January, 2019

In pursuance of the sanction accorded by the President under Rule 9 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, for instituting departmental proceedings against Shri..........................., vide Ministry/Department of.............................Order No...................................., dated,.................................it is proposed to hold an inquiry against the said Shri...................... in accordance with the procedure laid down in Rules 14 and 15 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Swapnil Subhashrao S/O Salunkhe vs Commissioner Of Police And Ors on 16 September, 2021

In support of contention that there is delay in execution of the order of detention, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on judgments in the case of SMF Sultan Abdul Kader Vs. JT Secy. To Govt. of India & Ors 1, K.P.M. Basheer Vs. State of Karnataka & Anr2, P.M. Hari Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors 3, Manju Ramesh Nahar Vs. Union of India & Ors 4, Ismail Shaikh Ali Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors 5, Shri. Netaji N. Lotikar Vs. State of Goa & Anr6 and Iqbal Vs. Union of India & Ors7. 1 (1998) 8 SCC 343 2 (1992) 2 SCC 295 3 (1995) 5 SCC 691 4 (1999) 4 SCC 116 5 (1998) ALL MR (Cri) 928 6 1992 CRI.
Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - S S Shinde - Full Document

Smt. Elangbam Ongbi R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs Smt. Brahmacharimayum Shyamanda ... on 13 November, 2006

14. The Apex Court discussed the power and jurisdiction Of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. in Mohanan v. Prabhya V. Nair . The fact in that case is that the appellant filed a criminal complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Cherthala alleging that the respondent who is a Gynaecologist attached to a private hospital had shown medical negligence of such a degree and thereby the appellant's-wife died on 8-12-1995. In the said criminal complaint the appellant alleged that in spite of repeated request to take his wife to Medical College Hospital, the respondent told him that the patient has no problem and everything would be alright within a short time. The appellant filed a complaint before the police and after investigation the police filed a report. Thereafter, the appellant filed a criminal complaint before the Magistrate. The Magistrate took cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 304-A, I.P.C. Thereafter, the first respondent filed a criminal misc. application before the High Court to quash the criminal proceeding alleging that the allegations made in the complaint along with the sworn statement and other materials before the Court, did not make out an offence and the complaint and other proceedings were liable to be quashed. The learned single Judge held that (para 1):
Gauhati High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - T N Singh - Full Document

Muthineni Krishna Rao And Others vs Union Of India And Ors. on 16 October, 1998

In fact there is a guidance by the Supreme Court in exactly a similar matter in the case of Union of India v. P. Sathikumarana Nair, in which service matters arising out of original application filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cochin Bench were pending before the Supreme Court and then Writ Petition under Article 32 was filed regarding similar matters and the Supreme Court had directly entertained the writ petition and granted the relief.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 99 - Cited by 5 - B S Reddy - Full Document

A.K. Soumini vs State Bank Of Travancore & Anr on 14 August, 2003

The respective learned senior counsel on either side, reiterated the stand taken before the High Court. On a careful consideration of the entire materials on record including the earlier decision of this Court in the very matter between parties, we are unable to approve the reasoning of the learned Single Judge, which is the sheet anchor of the submission for the appellant before us, besides placing reliance upon the decisions reported in Union of India & Another vs P.Sathikumarana Nair & Others [1997(10) SCC 663] and State Bank of India & Others vs T.J. Paul [1999 (4) SCC 759].
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 105 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next